Robots are not always bad for employment and wages
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rapid development of AI creates many economic benefits.
“The rapid development of AI creates many economic benefits (Damioli et al., 2021; Sequeira et al., 2021).”
From Impacts of generative artificial intelligence on the future of labor market: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Sequeira et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205 · see citing works
The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.184834 · Cited by 4,401 · see citing works
Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/705716 · Cited by 4,088 · see citing works
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D., Levy, F. S., & Murnane, R. J. (2001) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w8337 · Cited by 2,633 · see citing works
Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain
Goos, M., & Manning, A. (2007) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.89.1.118 · Cited by 2,287 · see citing works
Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00754 · Cited by 2,002 · see citing works
The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies
Dong, X., & McIntyre, S. H. (2014) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/14697688.2014.946440 · Cited by 1,681 · see citing works
Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets
Acemoğlu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23285 · Cited by 924 · see citing works
Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years
Michaels, G., Natraj, A., & Reenen, J. M. V. (2013) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00366 · Cited by 906 · see citing works
The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020) · Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsz022 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Competing with Robots: Firm-Level Evidence from France
Acemoğlu, D., Lelarge, C., & Restrepo, P. (2020) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.20201003 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
U.S. Commuting Zones and Labor Market Areas: A 1990 UpdatePreprint
Tolbert, C. M., & Sizer, M. (1996) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.278812 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
The Wrong Kind of AI? Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Labor Demand
Acemoğlu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w25682 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Emerging robotic regions in the United States: insights for regional economic evolution
Leigh, N. G., & Kraft, B. R. (2017) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1269158 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Explaining the Labor Share: Automation Vs Labor Market Institutions
Guimarães, L., & Gil, P. (2019) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102146 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Artuc, E., Bastos, P., & Rijkers, B. (2018) · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-8674 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Explaining the labor share: automation vs labor market institutions
Guimarães, L., & Gil, P. M. (2019) · Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impacts of generative artificial intelligence on the future of labor market: a systematic review
Salari, N., Beiromvand, M., Hosseinian-Far, A., Habibi, J., Babajani, F., & Mohammadi, M. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100652 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“From an organizational point of view, the use of AI in a new work structure leads to more intelligent organizational decisions (Sequeira et al., 2021) and promotes innovation (Füller et al., 2022).”
- Authors
- Sequeira, T. N., Garrido, S., & Santos, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Coimbra (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Sequeira, Tiago Neves
- Venue
- International Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 167
- Pages
- 108-119
- ISSN
- 2110-7017 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3096967565
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2023-12-01)
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- International Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Estudo Geral (Universidade de Coimbra) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UIDB/05037/2020)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Keywords
- robotization, automation, employment effects, wage effects, productivity effects, reallocation effects, displacement effects, transition dynamics, commuting zones
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
