The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What cognitive abilities are involved in trail-making performance?
Open accessAbstract
The cognitive abilities involved in the Connections (Salthouse, et al., 2000) version of the trail making test were investigated by administering the test, along with a battery of cognitive tests and tests of complex span and updating conceptualizations of working memory, to a sample of over 3,600 adults. The results indicate that this variant of the trail making test largely reflects individual differences in speed and fluid cognitive abilities, with the relative contributions of the two abilities varying according to particular measure of performance considered (e.g., difference, ratio, residual). Relations of age on trail making performance were also examined. Although strong age differences were evident in the Connections and working memory measures, with both sets of variables there was nearly complete overlap of the age differences with individual differences in speed and fluid cognitive abilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196772 · Cited by 2,882
Working Memory and Intelligence: The Same or Different Constructs?
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30 · Cited by 969
Blair, C. (2006) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x06009034 · Cited by 434
An fMRI study of the Trail Making Test
Zakzanis, K. K., Mraz, R., & Graham, S. J. (2005) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.013 · Cited by 408
Cited by
Diet, inflammation and the gut microbiome: mechanisms for obesity-associated cognitive impairment
Leigh, S.-J., & Morris, M. J. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165767 · Cited by 221
Does cognitive functioning predict chronic pain? Results from a prospective surgical cohort
Attal, N., Masselin-Dubois, A., Martinez, V., Jayr, C., Albi, A., Fermanian, J., Bouhassira, D., & Baudic, S. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt354 · Cited by 204
Implications of Infant Cognition for Executive Functions at Age 11
Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612444902 · Cited by 182
Genes Unite Executive Functions in Childhood
Engelhardt, L. E., Briley, D. A., Mann, F. D., Harden, K. P., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615577209 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Salthouse, T. A.
- Venue
- Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 222-232
- ISSN
- 0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011121242
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
