Cited by 40Spatial Cognition and NavigationCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Sex differences in mental rotation and cortical activation patterns: Can training change them?

Jaušovec, Norbert, Jaušovec, Ksenija·2012·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.005

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaušovec, N., & Jaušovec, K.
Affiliations
University of Maribor (SI)
Corresponding author
Jaušovec, Norbert
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
151-162
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988076751
Cited by
40
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
sex differences, mental rotation, training effects, theta synchronization, frontal brain activity, spatial ability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review