Cited by 531Cognitive Abilities and TestingEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Outcomes and Influences

Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis

Open access
Roth, Bettina, Becker, Nicolas, Romeyke, Sara, Schäfer, Sarah, Domnick, Florian, Spinath, Frank M.·2015·Intelligence

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal studies demonstrate that early intelligence test scores predict later educational attainment.

    “Longitudinal studies demonstrate the predictive power of early intelligence test scores for later educational attainment (Deary, Strand, Smith, & Fernandes, 2007;Roth et al., 2015).”

    From How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Roth et al., 2015

    The indexed 2015 Intelligence record (pp. 118–137) reports a correlation between standardized intelligence tests and school grades, supporting a general link with scholastic achievement. It does not establish that early scores predict later educational attainment in longitudinal studies; grades and educational attainment are different outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The relationship between the ideal L2 self and achievement is smaller than the magnitude that aptitude (r = .49, Li, 2016) and intelligence (r = .54, Roth et al., 2015) explain in academic achievement.

    “It is also smaller than the magnitude that aptitude (r = .49,Li, 2016) and intelligence (r = .54,Roth et al., 2015) explain in academic achievement, two established individual difference variables.”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Roth et al., 2015

    The indexed record for Roth et al. (2015, pp. 118–137) gives .54 in an abstract, but the record also says “No full text” and “No document available.” Because the available passages contain no paper-text results section, the cited intelligence–achievement correlation cannot be verified under the requirement to use the paper’s text rather than its abstract (searched: .54, intelligence, school grades, correlation). (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is ample evidence that pervasive selection processes operate in the intelligence-education association.

    “Indeed, there is ample evidence that pervasive selection processes operate in the intelligence-education association: Longitudinal studies demonstrate the predictive power of early intelligence test scores for later educational attainment (Deary, Strand, Smith, & Fernandes, 2007;Roth et al., 2015).”

    From How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Roth et al., 2015

    The indexed record for the 2015 article (pp. 118–137) says no full text is available. The retrieved passages do not establish whether Roth et al. report longitudinal evidence that early intelligence scores predict later educational attainment or discuss selection processes; searches for both points returned no passage from the paper’s text. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M.
Affiliations
Saarland University (DE)
Corresponding author
Roth, Bettina
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
53
Pages
118-137
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1843883362
Cited by
531
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
school grades, academic performance, general intelligence, population correlation, range restriction, measurement error, grade level

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review