Cited by 10Digital Mental Health InterventionsSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health via Writing

Online self-help for suicidal thoughts: 3-month follow-up results and participant evaluation

Open access
van Spijker, Bregje A.J., van Straten, Annemieke, Kerkhof, Ad J.F.M.·2015·Internet Interventions

Abstract

As a substantial proportion of people with suicidal thoughts does not receive treatment, the internet can be a utilized to reach more people who need support. To examine maintenance of effects of online self-help for suicidal thoughts at 3-month follow-up within the intervention group of a randomized controlled trial (of which between-group 6-week post-test results have previously been reported, showing a small effect of 0.28 for suicidal thoughts in favour of the intervention group), and to investigate acceptability of the intervention through participant evaluation. 236 adults with mild to moderate suicidal thoughts were randomized to the intervention (n = 116) or a waitlist control group (n = 120). Assessments took place at baseline, post-test (6 weeks later), and follow-up (3 months after post-test). This paper reports on the intervention group and follow-up assessment only. Effects established at 6-week post-test were generally maintained at 3-month follow-up in the intervention group. Participant evaluation revealed that a majority thought their suicidal thoughts had decreased during the study, that adherence to the intervention was below average, and that levels of satisfaction were acceptable. The control group could not serve as a comparator as they had received access to the intervention at post-test. Effects of online self-help for suicidal thoughts can be maintained for up to three months. Participant evaluation indicated that online self-help for suicidal thoughts is acceptable, but there is also room for improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2015.07.001

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brown, G.K., 2001. A Review of Suicide Assessment Measures for Intervention Research With Adults and Older Adults. University of Pennsylvania.
  2. Pietrzak, E., McLaughlin, R., 2009. The effectiveness of online suicide prevention programs: 1998-2009. A Literature Review. University of Queensland -Centre for Military and Veterans Health, Brisbane.
  3. van der Does, A.J.W., 2002. The Dutch Version of the Beck Depression Inventory -Second Edition. Swets Zeitlinger, Lisse.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Spijker, B. A. J., van Straten, A., & Kerkhof, A. J. F. M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
283-288
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126920288
Cited by
10
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Netherlands Health Research Council (120510003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
suicidal ideation, online self-help, online intervention, maintenance of treatment effects, acceptability, participant satisfaction, intervention adherence, waitlist control, suicide prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review