Cited by 85Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The effectiveness of a web-based self-help intervention to reduce suicidal thoughts: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
van Spijker, Bregje A J, van Straten, Annemieke, Kerkhof, Ad J F M·2010·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suicide, attempted suicide and suicidal thoughts are major public health problems worldwide. Effective face-to-face treatments are Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) and Problem Solving Treatment (PST). However, about two-thirds of persons who die by suicide have not been in contact with mental health care services in the preceding year, and many have never been treated. Furthermore, many patients do not disclose their suicidal thoughts to their care provider. This may be out of shame, due to fear of stigma or due to lack of trust in (mental) health care. Since many suicidal individuals seek information online, the internet provides an opportunity to reach suicidal individuals who would not be contacted otherwise. By providing a self-help intervention online, persons can anonymously learn to gain control over their suicidal thoughts. There is convincing evidence that self-help is effective for a number of mental disorders. In this study the effectiveness for suicidal thoughts is examined. METHODS/DESIGN: In this study, a recently developed self-help intervention will be evaluated in a Randomized Controlled Trial. The intervention is based on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and is aimed at subjects who experience mild to moderate suicidal thoughts. This is defined as a score between 1 and 26 on the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS). Higher and lower scores are excluded. In addition, severely depressed subjects are excluded. In total, 260 subjects will be randomly allocated to the intervention-condition (N = 130) or to the information-control condition (N = 130). Self-report questionnaires will be filled out at baseline, 6 weeks after baseline and 18 weeks after baseline. Primary outcome measure is the reduction in frequency and intensity of suicidal thoughts. Secondary outcome measures are the reduction of hopelessness, anxiety and depression, sleeplessness, worry and quality of life measures. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based self-help intervention for suicidal thoughts. Several limitations and strengths of the design are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR1689.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1745-6215-11-25

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy has been found efficacious in depression, anxiety and stress.

    “Acceptance and commitment therapy has been found to be efficacious in a number of mental health domains, including depression [10], anxiety [11] and stress [12].”

    From The effectiveness of a suicide prevention app for indigenous Australian youths: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. (2013) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Methods/Design > Intervention section describes a CBT-based intervention incorporating DBT, PST and MBCT, not acceptance and commitment therapy. Searches for acceptance and commitment therapy and ACT found no passage assessing its efficacy for depression, anxiety or stress; the cited paper therefore does not verify the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Such denial is more common during first assessments and in emergency departments, where patient and clinician are unfamiliar.

    “and more so in initial evaluations and emergency department settings, when patients and clinicians are less known to each other (266).”

    From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [266]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Van Ballegooijen W Van Spijker BAJ Kerkhof AJFM De kwaliteit van online suïcidepreventie in Nederland en Vlaanderen 2007 Tijdschr Psychiatr 2009 51 117 122 19194853
  2. Beck AT Steer RA Brown GK Beck depression inventory-second edition manual 1996 San Antonio: TX: The Psychological Corporation
  3. Brown GK A review of suicide assessment measures for intervention research with adults and older adults http://sbisrvntweb.uqac.ca/archivage/15290520.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Spijker, B. A. J., van Straten, A., & Kerkhof, A. J. F. M.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Venue
Trials
Published
2010-03-09
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
25-25
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095260228
Cited by
85
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicidal ideation, online intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, suicide prevention, hopelessness, depression, anxiety, insomnia, quality of life, help-seeking barriers
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Mental Health Services, Netherlands, Patient Education as Topic, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Self Care, Suicide, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review