Cited by 71Digital Mental Health InterventionsSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The online treatment of suicidal ideation: A randomised controlled trial of an unguided web-based intervention

De Jaegere, Eva, van Landschoot, Renate, van Heeringen, Kees, van Spijker, Bregje A.J., Kerkhof, Ad J.F.M., Mokkenstorm, Jan K., Portzky, Gwendolyn·2019·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Suicide is a major public health issue, and treatment of suicidal thoughts may contribute to its prevention. Provision of online treatment of suicidal ideation may reduce barriers that suicidal individuals experience in face-to-face treatment. We therefore aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a web-based intervention targeting a reduction of suicidal ideation. We carried out a two-arm, parallel-design, randomised controlled trial in the general population in Flanders (Belgium) (registered as NCT03209544). Participants who were 18 years or older and experienced suicidal ideation were included. The intervention group (n = 365) received access to the unguided web-based intervention, and the control group (n = 359) was placed on a waitlist. Assessments were carried out at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks. Participants reported high levels of suicidal ideation, depression, hopelessness, worrying, and anxiety at baseline. Compared to the control group, participants in the intervention group experienced a significant decline in suicidal ideation, depression, hopelessness, worrying, and anxiety both at post-test and at follow-up. An important limitation of the study was a high dropout rate, in particular in the intervention group. Our findings suggest that the online self-help intervention was more effective in reducing suicidal ideation and suicide-related symptoms than a waitlist control in a severely affected population. It can help in filling the gap between crisis help and face-to-face treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2019.05.003

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Jaegere, E., van Landschoot, R., van Heeringen, K., van Spijker, B. A. J., Kerkhof, A. J. F. M., Mokkenstorm, J. K., & Portzky, G.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
119
Pages
103406
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945246335
Cited by
71
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
suicidal ideation, online self-help intervention, online intervention, suicide prevention, depression, hopelessness, anxiety, worry, waitlist control, dropout, general population
MeSH terms
Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Internet-Based Intervention, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review