Cited by 11Digital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and careAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

An emotion-based online intervention for reducing anxiety and depression in cancer patients: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Tsiouris, Angeliki, Mayer, Anna, Nölke, Charlotte, Ruckes, Christian, Labitzke, Nicole, Wiltink, Jörg, Beutel, Manfred E., Zwerenz, Rüdiger·2021·Internet Interventions

Abstract

A cancer diagnosis can cause severe emotional distress and affect quality of life as well as social relationships. The transition from inpatient to outpatient treatment is burdened by stressful uncertainties and a gap of psycho-oncological care. In addition, further barriers, such as information deficits or fear of stigmatization, might hinder cancer patients to use psycho-oncological face-to-face interventions. Online interventions can be a low-threshold adjunct to existing face-to-face services. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the online self-help program epos (emotion-based psycho-oncological online self-help) on improving symptoms of anxiety and depression in German-speaking cancer patients. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is carried out in a parallel group design. N = 325 patients will be enrolled in the trial, randomly assigned to an intervention and a control group. While the intervention group has access to nine modules of epos, the control group gets access to an informational website. Participants will complete online questionnaires at baseline (T0), after the intervention (T1) and three-month follow-up (T2). Primary outcome is a combined measure of depression and anxiety. Secondary outcomes include psychological distress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, emotional control, posttraumatic growth, and satisfaction with epos. Participants are at least 18 years old, have a cancer diagnosis, currently receive cancer treatment or aftercare, have sufficient German language competence, and have access to the Internet. Exclusion criteria are severe mental comorbidities (i.e. severe depression, suicidality) or somatic comorbidities (i.e. visual disabilities). The results of this study will provide information about acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of epos in improving symptoms of depression and anxiety in cancer patients and thus contribute to the research on web-based interventions. If found efficacious, epos will improve psycho-oncological care in cancer patients in transition from inpatient to outpatient care and in those who struggle to find adequate psycho-oncological support due to other (perceived) barriers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100410

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outcomes of Internet-based interventions often differ depending on cancer type, patient demographics, and the underlying psychological approach, with most studies based on CBT or mindfulness-based approaches.

    “Outcomes often difer depending on cancer type, patient demographics, and the underlying psychological approach, with most studies based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or mindfulness-based approaches [19].”

    From Internet‐Based Telecare and Bibliotherapy Delivery of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Reducing Anxiety and Depression in Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Background (page not provided) says online psycho-oncological interventions differ by cancer type, patient sex, and theoretical approach, and that existing interventions predominantly use CBT or mindfulness-based approaches. It does not say that intervention outcomes differ depending on those factors; the claim substitutes variation in outcomes for variation in intervention design and populations. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bibliotherapy could be an effective supplementary therapy for cancer patients experiencing anxiety and depression.

    “According to some studies, bibliotherapy could be an efective supplementary therapy for cancer patients experiencing anxiety and depression [19].”

    From Internet‐Based Telecare and Bibliotherapy Delivery of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Reducing Anxiety and Depression in Breast Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Methods > Intervention section describes an online self-help program that includes psycho-educational texts, and the Background discusses online interventions for cancer patients. Neither passage addresses whether bibliotherapy is an effective supplementary therapy for anxiety and depression; a search for “bibliotherapy” found no passage making that point. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schmidt J. Lamprecht F. Wittmann W. Zufriedenheit mit der stationären Versorgung. Entwicklung eines Fragebogens und erste Validitätsuntersuchungen [Satisfaction with inpatient care: development of a questionnaire and first validity assessments] Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 39 7 1989 248 255 2762479

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsiouris, A., Mayer, A., Nölke, C., Ruckes, C., Labitzke, N., Wiltink, J., Beutel, M. E., & Zwerenz, R.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Tsiouris, Angeliki
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
25
Pages
100410
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3169108909
Cited by
11
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
  • Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cancer patients, anxiety, depression, psycho-oncology, online self-help intervention, EPOS, psychological distress, quality of life, posttraumatic growth, emotional control, transition from inpatient to outpatient care, online intervention, feasibility and acceptability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review