Cited by 35Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CareHealth Policy Implementation Science

Accessibility, Availability, and Potential Benefits of Psycho-Oncology Services: The Perspective of Community-Based Physicians Providing Cancer Survivorship Care

Open access
Zimmermann-Schlegel, Verena, Hartmann, Mechthild, Sklenarova, Halina, Herzog, Wolfgang, Haun, Markus W.·2017·The Oncologist

Abstract

Background: As persons of trust, community-based physicians providing survivorship care (e.g., general practitioners [GPs]) often serve as the primary contacts for cancer survivors disclosing distress. From the perspective of physicians providing survivorship care for cancer patients, this study explores (a) the accessibility, availability, and potential benefits of psycho-oncology services; (b) whether physicians themselves provide psychosocial support; and (c) predictors for impeded referrals of survivors to services. Methods: In a cross-sectional survey, all GPs and community-based specialists in a defined region were interviewed. In addition to descriptive analyses, categorical data were investigated by applying chi-square tests. Predictors for impeded referrals were explored through logistic regression. Results: Of 683 responding physicians, the vast majority stated that survivors benefit from psycho-oncology services (96.8%), but the physicians also articulated that insufficient coverage of psycho-oncology services (90.9%) was often accompanied by impeded referrals (77.7%). A substantial proportion (14.9%) of physicians did not offer any psychosocial support. The odds of physicians in rural areas reporting impeded referrals were 1.91 times greater than the odds of physicians in large urban areas making a similar report (95% confidence interval [1.07, 3.40]). Conclusion: Most community-based physicians providing survivorship care regard psycho-oncology services as highly beneficial. However, a large number of physicians report tremendous difficulty referring patients. Focusing on those physicians not providing any psychosocial support, health policy approaches should specifically (a) raise awareness of the role of physicians as persons of trust for survivors, (b) highlight the effectiveness of psycho-oncology services, and (c) encourage a proactive attitude toward the assessment of unmet needs and the initiation of comprehensive care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0245

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Access to in-person supportive care is often limited by clinician shortages, financial constraints, and time available to attend therapy sessions.

    “Access to in-person supportive care is often limited by clinician shortages, financial constraints, and time available to attend therapy sessions [9-13].”

    From Co-Designing the MOSAIC mHealth App With Breast Cancer Survivors: User-Centered Design Approach (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Availability and Accessibility section reports insufficient local psycho-oncology coverage and difficult access to psychotherapists, supporting the clinician-shortage portion of the claim. The Discussion mentions long wait lists, but does not identify financial constraints or patients’ time to attend therapy sessions as barriers; it describes the German care setting as providing free healthcare. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Breast cancer survivors in this study recognized the current limitations of in-person psychosocial support, particularly a shortage of mental health clinicians trained to meet the unique needs of cancer survivors.

    “Breast cancer survivors in this study recognized the current limitations of in-person psychosocial support [9,71], particularly a shortage of mental health clinicians trained to meet the unique needs of cancer survivors [11,72,73].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Holland JC, Andersen B, Breitbart WS et al. Dis- tress management. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2013; 11:190-209.
  2. Del Giudice ME, Leszcz M, Pritchard KI et al. Attitudes of Canadian oncology practitioners toward psychosocial interventions in clinical and research settings in women with breast cancer. Psychooncol- ogy 1997;6:178-189.
  3. Adler NE, Page AE, eds. Cancer care for the whole patient: Meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmermann-Schlegel, V., Hartmann, M., Sklenarova, H., Herzog, W., & Haun, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Haun, Markus W.
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2017-04-24
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
719-727
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W2609367840
Cited by
35
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Oncologist (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
survivorship care, community-based physicians, general practitioners, referral barriers, psychosocial support, access to services, urban-rural differences, physician attitudes, health policy
MeSH terms
Psycho-Oncology, Survivorship, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review