CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and codesign of flourish: A digital suicide prevention intervention for LGBTQ+ youth who have experienced online victimization

Biernesser, Candice, Win, Emma, Escobar-Viera, César, Farzan, Rosta, Rose, Morgan, Goldstein, Tina·2023·Internet Interventions
DOI 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100663PMC PMC10491770
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100663

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Discover, design, build and test model (developed by Lyon et al., 2019).
Fig. 1 Discover, design, build and test model (developed by Lyon et al., 2019).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Flow of design sessions and HCD methods.
Fig. 2 Flow of design sessions and HCD methods.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Examples of persona profile and storyboard from group design sessions.
Fig. 3 Examples of persona profile and storyboard from group design sessions.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Screenshots from the flourish prototype.
Fig. 4 Screenshots from the flourish prototype.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Aboujaoude, 2015, Cyberbullying: review of an old problem gone viral, J. Adolesc. Health, 57, 10, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.011 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bevan Jones, 2020, Practitioner review: co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people, J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 61, 928, 10.1111/jcpp.13258 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Birkett, 2015, Does it get better? A longitudinal analysis of psychological distress and victimization in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning youth, J. Adolesc. Health, 56, 280, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.275 · DOI
  4. Bishop, 2022, A systematic review to determine how service provider practises impact effective service provision to lesbian, gay and bisexual consumers in a mental health setting, Clin. Psychol. Psychother., 29, 874, 10.1002/cpp.2699 · DOI
  5. Brent, 2013, Protecting adolescents from self-harm: a critical review of intervention studies, JAACAP., 52, 1260
  6. Cohen, 2022, The promise of digital mental health for LGBTQ+ youths, Psychiatr. Serv., 73, 1069, 10.1176/appi.ps.202100569 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Coppersmith, 2022, Just-in-time adaptive interventions for suicide prevention: promise, challenges, and future directions, Psychiatry., 85, 317, 10.1080/00332747.2022.2092828 · DOI
  8. Craig, 2021, Can social media participation enhance LGBTQ+ youth well-being? Development of the social media benefits scale, Soc. Med. Soc., 7, 1
  9. Damschroder, 2022, Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR outcomes addendum, Implement. Sci., 17, 7, 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hatzenbuehler, 2016, Stigma and minority stress as social determinants of health among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: research evidence and clinical implications, Pediatr. Clin. N. Am., 63, 985, 10.1016/j.pcl.2016.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hinduja, 2010, Bullying, cyberbullying and suicide, Arch. Suicide Res., 14, 206, 10.1080/13811118.2010.494133 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hinduja, 2011, Cyberbullying: a review of the legal issues facing educators, Prev. Sch. Fail., 55, 71, 10.1080/1045988X.2011.539433 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hodson, 2019, Co-design in mental health; mellow: a self-help holistic crisis planning mobile application by youth, for youth, Des. J., 22, 1529
  14. Horowitz, 2020, Validation and feasibility of the ASQ among pediatric medical and surgical inpatients, Hosp. Pediatr., 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0087 · DOI
  15. Leyro, 2010, Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: a review of the empirical literature among adults, Psychol. Bull., 136, 576, 10.1037/a0019712 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lyon, 2019, Use of human-centered design to improve implementation of evidence-based psychotherapies in low-resource communities: protocol for studies applying a framework to assess usability, JMIR Res. Protoc., 8, 10.2196/14990 · DOI
  17. Marshall, 2016, Suicide prevention interventions for sexual & gender minority youth: an unmet need, Yale J. Biol. Med., 89, 205
  18. McDermott, 2018, Norms and normalisation: understanding lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth, suicidality and help-seeking, Cult. Health Sex., 20, 156, 10.1080/13691058.2017.1335435 · DOI
  19. Meyer, 2003, Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence, Psychol. Bull., 129, 674, 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Neal, 2015, Expediting the analysis of qualitative data in evaluation: a procedure for the rapid identification of themes from audio recordings (RITA), Am. J. Eval., 36, 118, 10.1177/1098214014536601 · DOI
  21. Pettit, 2018, Assessment and management of suicide risk in children and adolescents, Cogn. Behav. Pract., 25, 460, 10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.04.001 · DOI
  22. Quintana-Orts, 2022, Beyond cyberbullying: investigating when and how cybervictimization predicts suicidal ideation, J. Interpers. Violence, 37, 935, 10.1177/0886260520913640 · DOI
  23. Raifman, 2020, Sexual orientation and suicide attempt disparities among US adolescents: 2009-2017, Pediatrics., 145, 10.1542/peds.2019-1658 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Sandelowski, 2000, Whatever happened to qualitative description?, Res. Nurs. Health, 23, 334, 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  25. Sandelowski, 2010, What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited, Res. Nurs. Health, 33, 77, 10.1002/nur.20362 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Schueller, 2020, Scaling evidence-based treatments through digital mental health, Am. Psychol., 75, 1093, 10.1037/amp0000654 · DOI
  27. Tindall, 2021, A first-hand experience of co-design in mental health service design: opportunities, challenges, and lessons, IJMHNI., 30, 1693
  28. Tynes, 2010, The development and validation of the online victimization scale for adolescents, Cyberpsychology., 4
  29. Whaibeh, 2020, Reducing the treatment gap for LGBT mental health needs: the potential of telepsychiatry, J. Behav. Health Serv. Res., 47, 424, 10.1007/s11414-019-09677-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Biernesser, C., Win, E., Escobar-Viera, C., Farzan, R., Rose, M., & Goldstein, T.
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
34
Pages
100663
ISSN
2214-7829
DOI
10.1016/j.invent.2023.100663
PMC
PMC10491770
Cited by
21
References
12
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR001857)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH131759, P50 MH115838, T32 MH018951)
  • American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (YIG-0-021-20)
  • University of Pittsburgh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and codesign of flourish: A digital suicide prevention intervention for LGBTQ+ youth who have experienced online victimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.invent.2023.100663
The paper
Biernesser, C., Win, E., Escobar-Viera, C., Farzan, R., Rose, M., & Goldstein, T. (2023). Development and codesign of flourish: A digital suicide prevention intervention for LGBTQ+ youth who have experienced online victimization. Internet Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2023.100663