Cited by 244scientometrics and bibliometrics researchLibrary Science and Information SystemsLibrary Science and Information

Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization

Hjørland, Birger·2013·Information Processing & Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hjørland, B.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Hjørland, Birger
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
1313-1325
ISSN
  • 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-4573
OpenAlex
W2006852464
Cited by
244
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
citation analysis, knowledge organization, bibliometric analysis, co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, thesaurus construction, knowledge organization systems, information ecology, scholarly literature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review