The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey on Blockchain for Information Systems Management and Security
Abstract
Abstract Blockchain technologies have grown in prominence in recent years, with many experts citing the potential applications of the technology in regard to different aspects of any industry, market, agency, or governmental organizations. In the brief history of blockchain, an incredible number of achievements have been made regarding how blockchain can be utilized and the impacts it might have on several industries. The sheer number and complexity of these aspects can make it difficult to address blockchain potentials and complexities, especially when trying to address its purpose and fitness for a specific task. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of applying blockchain as a service for applications within today’s information systems. The survey gives the reader a deeper perspective on how blockchain helps to secure and manage today information systems. The survey contains a comprehensive reporting on different instances of blockchain studies and applications proposed by the research community and their respective impacts on blockchain and its use across other applications or scenarios. Some of the most important findings this survey highlights include the fact that blockchain’s structure and modern cloud- and edge-computing paradigms are crucial in enabling a widespread adaption and development of blockchain technologies for new players in today unprecedented vibrant global market. Ensuring that blockchain is widely available through public and open-source code libraries and tools will help to ensure that the full potential of the technology is reached and that further developments can be made concerning the long-term goals of blockchain enthusiasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Wright, C. S. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3440802 · Cited by 13,922
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Squarepants, S. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3977007 · Cited by 11,148
Blockchain technology: principles and applications
Pilkington, M. (2016) · Research Handbook on Digital Transformations · doi:10.4337/9781784717766.00019 · Cited by 1,627
Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., & Jiang, W. (2016) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0574-6 · Cited by 1,240
Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here
Mettler, M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom) · doi:10.1109/healthcom.2016.7749510 · Cited by 1,237
Security and Privacy on Blockchain
Zhang, R., Xue, R., & Liu, L. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3316481 · Cited by 959
The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency
Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics2010002 · Cited by 951
Blockchain-based decentralized trust management in vehicular networks
Yang, Z., Yang, K., Lei, L., Zheng, K., & Leung, V. C. M. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2836144 · Cited by 932
A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for IoT
Dwivedi, A. D., Srivastava, G., Dhar, S., & Singh, R. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19020326 · Cited by 881
Blockchain-based traceability in Agri-Food supply chain management: A practical implementation
Caro, M. P., Ali, M. S., Vecchio, M., & Giaffreda, R. (2018) · 2018 IoT Vertical and Topical Summit on Agriculture - Tuscany (IOT Tuscany) · doi:10.1109/iot-tuscany.2018.8373021 · Cited by 861
Cited by
Blockchain Technology in Financial Accounting: Enhancing Transparency, Security, and ESG Reporting
Almadadha, R. (2024) · Blockchains · doi:10.3390/blockchains2030015 · Cited by 74
A survey of blockchain applications in sustainable and smart cities
Makani, S., Pittala, R., Alsayed, E., Aloqaily, M., & Jararweh, Y. (2022) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-022-03625-z · Cited by 66
Self-citationAlzoubi, Y. I., Gill, A., & Mishra, A. (2022) · Journal of Cloud Computing · doi:10.1186/s13677-022-00353-y · Cited by 60
A Survey of Blockchain-Based Schemes for Data Sharing and Exchange
Song, R., Xiao, B., Song, Y., Guo, S., & Yang, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2023.3293279 · Cited by 59
Jafar, U., Ab Aziz, M. J., Shukur, Z., & Hussain, H. A. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22197585 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Berdik, D., Otoum, S., Schmidt, N., Porter, D., & Jararweh, Y.
- Venue
- Information Processing & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102397
- ISSN
- 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-4573
- OpenAlex
- W3089656219
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 145
- FWCI
- 86.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey on Blockchain for Information Systems Management and Security. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102397
- The paper
- Berdik, D., Otoum, S., Schmidt, N., Porter, D., & Jararweh, Y. (2021). A Survey on Blockchain for Information Systems Management and Security. Information Processing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.