Cited by 881Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityInternet of Things and AIIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for IoT

Open access
Dwivedi, Ashutosh Dhar, Srivastava, Gautam, Dhar, Shalini, Singh, Rajani·2019·Sensors

Abstract

Medical care has become one of the most indispensable parts of human lives, leading to a dramatic increase in medical big data. To streamline the diagnosis and treatment process, healthcare professionals are now adopting Internet of Things (IoT)-based wearable technology. Recent years have witnessed billions of sensors, devices, and vehicles being connected through the Internet. One such technology-remote patient monitoring-is common nowadays for the treatment and care of patients. However, these technologies also pose grave privacy risks and security concerns about the data transfer and the logging of data transactions. These security and privacy problems of medical data could result from a delay in treatment progress, even endangering the patient's life. We propose the use of a blockchain to provide secure management and analysis of healthcare big data. However, blockchains are computationally expensive, demand high bandwidth and extra computational power, and are therefore not completely suitable for most resource-constrained IoT devices meant for smart cities. In this work, we try to resolve the above-mentioned issues of using blockchain with IoT devices. We propose a novel framework of modified blockchain models suitable for IoT devices that rely on their distributed nature and other additional privacy and security properties of the network. These additional privacy and security properties in our model are based on advanced cryptographic primitives. The solutions given here make IoT application data and transactions more secure and anonymous over a blockchain-based network.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s19020326

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have begun to incorporate analogous and peripheral technologies into blockchain-based system architectures, including IoT, sensors, wireless body area networks, big data, edge computing, and cloud technology.

    “Recent studies have begun to incorporate analogous and peripheral technologies into blockchain-based system architectures that include IoT (Dwivedi et al., 2019), sensors (Casado-Vara & Corchado, 2019), wireless body area networks (Griggs et al., 2018), (Mamoshina et al., 2018), big data (Dhagarra et al., 2019), edge computing (Zheng et al., 2019), and cloud technology (Kaur et al., 2018).”
  • Dwivedi et al. refer to resource constraints related to IoT; Zhang et al. acknowledge costs of deploying a decentralized app.

    “For example, Dwivedi et al. (2019) refer to the resource constraints related to IoT, whereas Zhang et al. (2018) acknowledge the costs associated with deploying a decentralized app for deploying blockchain.”
  • Strategic issues include resource constraints; technical issues include performance uncertainty and system requirements.

    “These include strategic issues, such as resource constraints (Dwivedi et al., 2019) and technical issues, such as performance uncertainty (Hyla and Pejaś, 2019) and system requirements (Quaini et al., 2018).”
  • Dwivedi et al.'s decentralized blockchain data security scheme has not had actual simulations rendered.

    “The weakness of the article is that actual simulations have not been rendered on the suggested security scheme.”
  • The storage and management of medical details need a consistent concept of access control, authentication, and immutability of data information to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, and reliability of health documents and health reports.

    “The storage and management of medical details need a consistent concept of access control, authentication, and immutability of data information to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, and reliability of health documents and health reports that contain all wearable sensor results and service facilities’ patient treatment records (Dwivedi et al. 2019).”

    From Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technology in E-Health (2021) · cites this paper as Dwivedi et al. 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

3 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Buccafurri F. Fotia L. Lax G. Social Signature: Signing by Tweeting Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective Kő A. Francesconi E. Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland 2014 1 14
  2. [34]Rivest R.L. Shamir A. Tauman Y. How to Leak a Secret Advances in Cryptology—ASIACRYPT 2001 Boyd C. Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2001 552 565

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dwivedi, A. D., Srivastava, G., Dhar, S., & Singh, R.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Computer Science (PL)
  • China Medical University (TW)
  • University of Allahabad (IN)
Corresponding author
Srivastava, Gautam
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-01-15
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
326
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2908737503
Cited by
881
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 180 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 53
FWCI
157.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
blockchain in healthcare, Internet of Things, wearable devices, remote patient monitoring, medical data privacy, decentralized blockchain, resource-constrained IoT devices, cryptographic primitives, data security, smart cities, big data in healthcare
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Big Data, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Computer Security, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review