CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Extracellular vesicles in diseaseNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tumor-derived extracellular vesicle drug delivery system for chemo-photothermal-immune combination cancer treatment

Open access
Bi, Yanghui, Chen, Jieya, Li, Qing, Li, Yan, Zhang, Ling, Zhida, Liu, Yuan, Fajia, Zhang, Ruiping·2024·iScience
DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108833PMC PMC10850737
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Tumor extracellular vesicles (EVs) demonstrate considerable promise for medication delivery and tumor targeting owing to their natural long-term blood circulation and tissue targeting capabilities. We extracted EVs from mouse breast cancer cell 4T1 using UV stimulation and differential centrifugation. To create a new nano-drug delivery system, the vesicle delivery system (EPM) loaded with melanin and paclitaxel albumin (PA), the collected EVs were repeatedly compressed on a 200 nm porous polycarbonate membrane with melanin and PA. Our findings suggest that EPM is readily absorbed by breast cancer and dendritic cells. EPM generates significant photoacoustic signals and photothermal effects when exposed to near-infrared light and can enhance the infiltration of CD8 + T cells in mouse tumor tissues. EPM is more cytotoxic than PA in in vivo and in vitro investigations. The efficacy of EPM in clinical transformation when paired with chemotherapy/photothermal/immunotherapy treatment is demonstrated in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108833

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 1 Characterization of EPM (A) TEM images of EVs and EPM. Scale bars, 0.5 μm. (B) Overall distribution of hydrodynamic diameters of EVs and EPM (DLS). (C) Zeta potential of EVs, melanin, EPM. (D) The protein expression of CD63, ALIX cytochrome c, and Annexin V in EVs, EPM, and 4T1 cells. (E) Stability analysis of EPM: average hydrodynamic diameter of EPM.
Figure 1 Characterization of EPM (A) TEM images of EVs and EPM. Scale bars, 0.5 μm. (B) Overall distribution of hydrodynamic diameters of EVs and EPM (DLS). (C) Zeta potential of EVs, melanin, EPM. (D) The protein expression of CD63, ALIX cytochrome c, and Annexin V in EVs, EPM, and 4T1 cells. (E) Stability analysis of EPM: average hydrodynamic diameter of EPM.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Evaluation of photoacoustic, photothermal performance of EPM (A) Photoacoustic signal of EPM and EVs solution. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (B) Concentration-dependent thermal infrared images of EPM solutions within 5 min under 808 nm laser irradiation (1 W/cm2). (C) Temperature change curves of a series of EPM solutions with different concentrations recorded with 808 nm laser irradiation (1 W/cm2). (D) Power density-dependent thermal infrared images of EPM solutions (100 μg/mL) within 5 min under 808 nm laser irradiation. (E) Temperature change curves of EPM solution (100 μg/mL) under 808 nm laser irradiation with different power densities. (F) The heating and cooling curves of EPM solution (100 μg/mL) measured with irradiation of 808 nm laser (1 W/cm2). (G) Photothermal stability of EPM (100 μg/mL) solution upon irradiation for six cycles (808 nm, 1W/cm2).
Figure 2 Evaluation of photoacoustic, photothermal performance of EPM (A) Photoacoustic signal of EPM and EVs solution. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (B) Concentration-dependent thermal infrared images of EPM solutions within 5 min under 808 nm laser irradiation (1 W/cm2). (C) Temperature change curves of a series of EPM solutions with different concentrations recorded with 808 nm laser irradiation (1 W/cm2). (D) Power density-dependent thermal infrared images of EPM solutions (100 μg/mL) within 5 min under 808 nm laser irradiation. (E) Temperature change curves of EPM solution (100 μg/mL) under 808 nm laser irradiation with different power densities. (F) The heating and cooling curves of EPM solution (100 μg/mL) measured with irradiation of 808 nm laser (1 W/cm2). (G) Photothermal stability of EPM (100 μg/mL) solution upon irradiation for six cycles (808 nm, 1W/cm2).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 3 EPM uptake by 4T1 cells, evaluation of internalization mechanism, and EPM lethal impact on 4T1 cells (A) Flow cytometry was used to quantify 4T1 cell EPM uptake at 0.5 h, 1.0 h, and 3 h. (B) Laser confocal images of 4T1 cells uptake EPM at the above time points. Orange-red fluorescence represents Dir-labeled EPM, blue fluorescence (DAPI) represents cell nuclei, and the merge image shows the combination of orange-red and blue fluorescence. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (C) Flow cytometry was used to quantify 4T1 cell EPM uptake under different conditions, including 4°C, 37°C, chlorpromazine (100 μM), and amiloride hydrochloride (25 μM). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (D and E) Flow cytometry was used to detect the effect of EPM on 4T1 cell apoptosis. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Figure 3 EPM uptake by 4T1 cells, evaluation of internalization mechanism, and EPM lethal impact on 4T1 cells (A) Flow cytometry was used to quantify 4T1 cell EPM uptake at 0.5 h, 1.0 h, and 3 h. (B) Laser confocal images of 4T1 cells uptake EPM at the above time points. Orange-red fluorescence represents Dir-labeled EPM, blue fluorescence (DAPI) represents cell nuclei, and the merge image shows the combination of orange-red and blue fluorescence. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (C) Flow cytometry was used to quantify 4T1 cell EPM uptake under different conditions, including 4°C, 37°C, chlorpromazine (100 μM), and amiloride hydrochloride (25 μM). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (D and E) Flow cytometry was used to detect the effect of EPM on 4T1 cell apoptosis. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 4 In vivo imaging and evaluation of therapeutic effect (A) Representative time-dependent photoacoustic images in orthotopic breast cancer mice treated with EPM at predetermined time points during 24 h. (B) The quantitative analysis intensities of tumor tissue (n = 3) determined by photoacoustic imaging at selected time intervals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (C) Schematic depicting the experimental approach. (D) Photographs of excised tumors (n = 5 per group) at day 26 after different treatments. (E) Relative tumors growth curves (n = 5 per group). p values were obtained using ANOVA. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by Student’s t test. (F) Body weight curves (n = 5 per group). (G–J) Detection of biomarkers of liver (ALT and AST) and kidney function (Scr and BUN) in mice (n = 3) with high-dose EPM injection. (K) Representative pictures of H&E staining of major organ tissues in mice with high-dose EPM injection. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Figure 4 In vivo imaging and evaluation of therapeutic effect (A) Representative time-dependent photoacoustic images in orthotopic breast cancer mice treated with EPM at predetermined time points during 24 h. (B) The quantitative analysis intensities of tumor tissue (n = 3) determined by photoacoustic imaging at selected time intervals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (C) Schematic depicting the experimental approach. (D) Photographs of excised tumors (n = 5 per group) at day 26 after different treatments. (E) Relative tumors growth curves (n = 5 per group). p values were obtained using ANOVA. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by Student’s t test. (F) Body weight curves (n = 5 per group). (G–J) Detection of biomarkers of liver (ALT and AST) and kidney function (Scr and BUN) in mice (n = 3) with high-dose EPM injection. (K) Representative pictures of H&E staining of major organ tissues in mice with high-dose EPM injection. Scale bar, 100 μm.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Evaluation of immune effects of EPM (A and B) The proportion of CD80 and CD86 double-positive cells in CD11c+ DCs was detected by flow cytometry. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (C) Assessment of EPM uptake by macrophages. Flow cytometry was used to quantify by CD80+CD86+ DCs EPM uptake at 0.5 h, 1.0 h, and 3 h. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (D and E) Flow cytometry was used to detect CD3+CD8+ T cell infiltration in tumor tissues (n = 5 per group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Figure 5 Evaluation of immune effects of EPM (A and B) The proportion of CD80 and CD86 double-positive cells in CD11c+ DCs was detected by flow cytometry. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (C) Assessment of EPM uptake by macrophages. Flow cytometry was used to quantify by CD80+CD86+ DCs EPM uptake at 0.5 h, 1.0 h, and 3 h. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗ ∗ ∗p < 0.001. (D and E) Flow cytometry was used to detect CD3+CD8+ T cell infiltration in tumor tissues (n = 5 per group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Pasha, 2021, Understanding and overcoming tumor heterogeneity in metastatic breast cancer treatment, Nat. Cancer, 2, 680, 10.1038/s43018-021-00229-1 · DOI
  2. Riggio, 2021, The lingering mysteries of metastatic recurrence in breast cancer, Br. J. Cancer, 124, 13, 10.1038/s41416-020-01161-4 · DOI
  3. Sun, 2020, Cancer nanomedicine meets immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges, Acta Pharmacol. Sin., 41, 954, 10.1038/s41401-020-0448-9 · DOI
  4. Park, 2022, Evolution of drug delivery systems: From 1950 to 2020 and beyond, J. Control. Release, 342, 53, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.12.030 · DOI
  5. Bordeianu, 2023, The Usefulness of Nanotechnology in Improving the Prognosis of Lung Cancer, Biomedicines, 11, 705, 10.3390/biomedicines11030705 · DOI
  6. Elsharkasy, 2020, Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: Why and how?, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 159, 332, 10.1016/j.addr.2020.04.004 · DOI
  7. Tkach, 2018, Why the need and how to approach the functional diversity of extracellular vesicles, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 373, 20160479, 10.1098/rstb.2016.0479 · DOI
  8. Walker, 2019, Extracellular vesicle-based drug delivery systems for cancer treatment, Theranostics, 9, 8001, 10.7150/thno.37097 · DOI
  9. Bose, 2018, Tumor Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicle-Coated Nanocarriers: An Efficient Theranostic Platform for the Cancer-Specific Delivery of Anti-miR-21 and Imaging Agents, ACS Nano, 12, 10817, 10.1021/acsnano.8b02587 · DOI
  10. Li, 2021, Cell-derived biomimetic nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy: cell membranes and extracellular vesicles, Drug Deliv., 28, 1237, 10.1080/10717544.2021.1938757 · DOI
  11. Xu, 2022, Tumor-Derived Membrane Vesicles: A Promising Tool for Personalized Immunotherapy, Pharmaceuticals, 15, 876, 10.3390/ph15070876 · DOI
  12. Marar, 2021, Extracellular vesicles in immunomodulation and tumor progression, Nat. Immunol., 22, 560, 10.1038/s41590-021-00899-0 · DOI
  13. Li, 2021, Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Their Role in Immune Cells and Immunotherapy, Int. J. Nanomedicine, 16, 5395, 10.2147/IJN.S313912 · DOI
  14. Xu, 2022, Cell Membrane-Derived Vesicle: A Novel Vehicle for Cancer Immunotherapy, Front. Immunol., 13, 923598, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.923598 · DOI
  15. Sun, 2016, Drug combination therapy increases successful drug repositioning, Drug Discov. Today, 21, 1189, 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.05.015 · DOI
  16. Ayoub, 2021, Editorial: Novel Combination Therapies for the Treatment of Solid Cancers, Front. Oncol., 11, 708943, 10.3389/fonc.2021.708943 · DOI
  17. Nam, 2018, Chemo-photothermal therapy combination elicits anti-tumor immunity against advanced metastatic cancer, Nat. Commun., 9, 1074, 10.1038/s41467-018-03473-9 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Li, 2020, Clinical development and potential of photothermal and photodynamic therapies for cancer, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., 17, 657, 10.1038/s41571-020-0410-2 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wang, 2021, Near-infrared inorganic nanomaterial-based nanosystems for photothermal therapy, Nanoscale, 13, 8751, 10.1039/D1NR00323B · DOI
  20. Cordero, 2020, Melanin, Curr. Biol., 30, R142, 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.042 · DOI
  21. Liu, 2023, Highly localized, efficient, and rapid photothermal therapy using gold nanobipyramids for liver cancer cells triggered by femtosecond laser, Sci. Rep., 13, 3372, 10.1038/s41598-023-30526-x · DOI
  22. He, 2022, Thermal-Responsive MXene-DNA Hydrogel for Near-Infrared Light Triggered Localized Photothermal-Chemo Synergistic Cancer Therapy, Small, 18, e2200263, 10.1002/smll.202200263 · DOI
  23. Chang, 2022, Organic single molecule based nano-platform for NIR-II imaging and chemo-photothermal synergistic treatment of tumor, Biomaterials, 287, 121670, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121670 · DOI
  24. Herrmann, 2021, Extracellular vesicles as a next-generation drug delivery platform, Nat. Nanotechnol., 16, 748, 10.1038/s41565-021-00931-2 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Meng, 2020, Prospects and challenges of extracellular vesicle-based drug delivery system: considering cell source, Drug Deliv., 27, 585, 10.1080/10717544.2020.1748758 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Igami, 2020, Characterization and function of medium and large extracellular vesicles from plasma and urine by surface antigens and Annexin V, PeerJ Anal. Chem., 2, e4, 10.7717/peerj-achem.4 · DOI
  27. Zhao, 2021, Apoptotic body–mediated intercellular delivery for enhanced drug penetration and whole tumor destruction, Sci. Adv., 7, eabg0880, 10.1126/sciadv.abg0880 · DOI
  28. Wang, 2021, Delivering Antisense Oligonucleotides across the Blood-Brain Barrier by Tumor Cell-Derived Small Apoptotic Bodies, Adv. Sci., 8, 2004929, 10.1002/advs.202004929 · DOI
  29. Yu, 2019, Sequentially responsive biomimetic nanoparticles with optimal size in combination with checkpoint blockade for cascade synergetic treatment of breast cancer and lung metastasis, Biomaterials, 217, 119309, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119309 · DOI
  30. Gong, 2020, Macrophage-cancer hybrid membrane-coated nanoparticles for targeting lung metastasis in breast cancer therapy, J. Nanobiotechnology, 18, 92, 10.1186/s12951-020-00649-8 · DOI
  31. Zhou, 2017, Reprogramming Malignant Cancer Cells toward a Benign Phenotype following Exposure to Human Embryonic Stem Cell Microenvironment, PLoS One, 12, e0169899, 10.1371/journal.pone.0169899 · DOI
  32. Wortzel, 2019, Exosome-Mediated Metastasis: Communication from a Distance, Dev. Cell, 49, 347, 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.011 · DOI
  33. Wu, 2021, Extracellular vesicles and immunogenic stress in cancer, Cell Death Dis., 12, 894, 10.1038/s41419-021-04171-z · DOI
  34. Hanahan, 2022, Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions, Cancer Discov., 12, 31, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Forster, 2017, A review of the development of tumor vasculature and its effects on the tumor microenvironment, Hypoxia, 5, 21, 10.2147/HP.S133231 · DOI
  36. Majidpoor, 2021, Angiogenesis as a hallmark of solid tumors - clinical perspectives, Cell. Oncol., 44, 715, 10.1007/s13402-021-00602-3 · DOI
  37. Ma, 2016, Reversing drug resistance of soft tumor-repopulating cells by tumor cell-derived chemotherapeutic microparticles, Cell Res., 26, 713, 10.1038/cr.2016.53 · DOI
  38. Wu, 2019, Surface-Layer Protein-Enhanced Immunotherapy Based on Cell Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles for the Effective Inhibition of Tumor Growth and Metastasis, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 9850, 10.1021/acsami.9b00294 · DOI
  39. Wang, 2020, Engineering antigen as photosensitiser nanocarrier to facilitate ROS triggered immune cascade for photodynamic immunotherapy, Biomaterials, 244, 119964, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119964 · DOI
  40. Zheng, 2020, In Vivo Monocyte/Macrophage-Hitchhiked Intratumoral Accumulation of Nanomedicines for Enhanced Tumor Therapy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 142, 382, 10.1021/jacs.9b11046 · DOI
  41. Barenholz-Cohen, 2020, Lung mechanics modifications facilitating metastasis are mediated in part by breast cancer-derived extracellular vesicles, Int. J. Cancer, 147, 2924, 10.1002/ijc.33229 · DOI
  42. Mavridi-Printezi, 2023, Functionalization of and through Melanin: Strategies and Bio-Applications, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24, 9689, 10.3390/ijms24119689 · DOI
  43. Jiang, 2019, Erythrocyte-cancer hybrid membrane-camouflaged melanin nanoparticles for enhancing photothermal therapy efficacy in tumors, Biomaterials, 192, 292, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.021 · DOI
  44. Jiang, 2017, Red blood cell membrane-camouflaged melanin nanoparticles for enhanced photothermal therapy, Biomaterials, 143, 29, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.07.027 · DOI
  45. Gujrati, 2019, Bioengineered bacterial vesicles as biological nano-heaters for optoacoustic imaging, Nat. Commun., 10, 1114, 10.1038/s41467-019-09034-y · DOI
  46. Li, 2023, Cascaded microfluidic circuits for pulsatile filtration of extracellular vesicles from whole blood for early cancer diagnosis, Sci. Adv., 9, eade2819, 10.1126/sciadv.ade2819 · DOI
  47. Speiser, 2023, CD4+ T cells in cancer, Nat. Cancer, 4, 317, 10.1038/s43018-023-00521-2 · DOI
  48. Waldman, 2020, A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 20, 651, 10.1038/s41577-020-0306-5 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Jhunjhunwala, 2021, Antigen presentation in cancer: insights into tumour immunogenicity and immune evasion, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 21, 298, 10.1038/s41568-021-00339-z · DOI
  50. Zou, 2022, Immune regulation in the tumor microenvironment and its relevance in cancer therapy, Cell. Mol. Immunol., 19, 1, 10.1038/s41423-021-00738-0 · DOI
  51. Tie, 2022, Immunosuppressive cells in cancer: mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets, J. Hematol. Oncol., 15, 61, 10.1186/s13045-022-01282-8 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Buzas, 2023, The roles of extracellular vesicles in the immune system, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 23, 236, 10.1038/s41577-022-00763-8 · DOI
  53. Li, 2022, Antigen Capture and Immune Modulation by Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicles as In Situ Vaccine for Cancer Immunotherapy Post-Photothermal Therapy, Small, 18, e2107461, 10.1002/smll.202107461 · DOI
  54. Guo, 2022, Engineered nanomaterials for synergistic photo-immunotherapy, Biomaterials, 282, 121425, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121425 · DOI
  55. Shang, 2020, Nanomedicine-based tumor photothermal therapy synergized immunotherapy, Biomater. Sci., 8, 5241, 10.1039/D0BM01158D · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bi, Y., Chen, J., Li, Q., Li, Y., Zhang, L., Zhida, L., Yuan, F., & Zhang, R.
Affiliations
Shanxi Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Ruiping
ORCID
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
108833
ISSN
2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.isci.2024.108833
PMC
PMC10850737
OpenAlex
W4390661715
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 4
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Shaanxi Key Science and Technology Innovation Team Project (202204051001024)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (202104010910010, 2023YFC3402800, 2021YZ17)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82002606, 82071987, 82120108016)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
tumor-derived extracellular vesicles, melanin, photothermal therapy, near-infrared light, photoacoustic imaging, combination cancer therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, CD8+ T cell infiltration, breast cancer, 4T1 cells, dendritic cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review