Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Land cover mapping at very high resolution with rotation equivariant CNNs: Towards small yet accurate models

Open access
Marcos, Diego, Volpi, Michele, Kellenberger, Benjamin, Tuia, Devis·2018·ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Abstract In remote sensing images, the absolute orientation of objects is arbitrary. Depending on an object’s orientation and on a sensor’s flight path, objects of the same semantic class can be observed in different orientations in the same image. Equivariance to rotation, in this context understood as responding with a rotated semantic label map when subject to a rotation of the input image, is therefore a very desirable feature, in particular for high capacity models, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). If rotation equivariance is encoded in the network, the model is confronted with a simpler task and does not need to learn specific (and redundant) weights to address rotated versions of the same object class. In this work we propose a CNN architecture called Rotation Equivariant Vector Field Network (RotEqNet) to encode rotation equivariance in the network itself. By using rotating convolutions as building blocks and passing only the values corresponding to the maximally activating orientation throughout the network in the form of orientation encoding vector fields, RotEqNet treats rotated versions of the same object with the same filter bank and therefore achieves state-of-the-art performances even when using very small architectures trained from scratch. We test RotEqNet in two challenging sub-decimeter resolution semantic labeling problems, and show that we can perform better than a standard CNN while requiring one order of magnitude less parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.01.021

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cohen, T.S., Welling, M., 2016. Group Equivariant Convolutional Networks. Available from: <arXiv:1602.07576>. · arXiv
  2. Glocer, K., Eads, D., Theiler, J., 2005. Online feature selection for pixel classification. In: Int. Conf. Machine Learning, Bonn, Germany. · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102383
  3. Jaderberg, M., Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A., et al., 2015. Spatial transformer networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2017–2025.
  4. Regniers, 2016, Supervised classification of very high resolution optical images using wavelet-based textural features, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 54, 3722, 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2526078 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2016.2526078

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Marcos, D., Volpi, M., Kellenberger, B., & Tuia, D.
Venue
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
145
Pages
96-107
ISSN
0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793461576
Cited by
282
References
34
FWCI
24.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation (PZ00P2-136827)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Land cover mapping at very high resolution with rotation equivariant CNNs: Towards small yet accurate models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.01.021
The paper
Marcos, D., Volpi, M., Kellenberger, B., & Tuia, D. (2018). Land cover mapping at very high resolution with rotation equivariant CNNs: Towards small yet accurate models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.01.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.