Cited by 558Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsRemote Sensing and Land Use

Algorithms for semantic segmentation of multispectral remote sensing imagery using deep learning

Open access
Kemker, Ronald, Salvaggio, Carl, Kanan, Christopher·2018·ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.04.014

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results on datasets with higher levels of difficulty (e.g., RIT-18) show that the improvement of networks for semantic segmentation needs to be further explored in the future.

    “However, the results on datasets with higher levels of difficulty, e.g., RIT-18 (Kemker et al., 2018) show that the improvement of networks for semantic segmentation need to be further explored in the future.”

    From Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review (2019) · cites this paper as Kemker et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1][1] [2017 IEEE GRSS Data Fusion Contest (2017). URL data-fusion/](http://www.grss-ieee.org/community/technical-committees/data-fusion/) -
  2. [5][5] K. Simonyan, A. Zisserman, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for LargeScale Image Recognition, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2014. -
  3. [28][28] Z. Lin, Y. Chen, X. Zhao, G. Wang, Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral image using autoencoders, in: Information, Communications and Signal Processing, IEEE, 2013, pp. 1-5. -
  4. [56][56] Y. Huang, S. J. Thomson, Y. Lan, S. J. Maas, Multispectral Imaging Systems for Airborne Remote Sensing to Support Agricultural Production Management, International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering 3 (1) (2010) 50-62. -
  5. [60][60] Agisoft LLC, Agisoft photoscan user manual professional edition, version 1.2, http://www.agisoft.com/downloads/user-manuals/ (2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemker, R., Salvaggio, C., & Kanan, C.
Affiliations
Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kanan, Christopher
Venue
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
145
Pages
60-77
ISSN
0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2760340275
Cited by
558
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
39.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
Keywords
semantic segmentation, multispectral imagery, deep convolutional neural networks, synthetic images, limited labeled data, network initialization, very high resolution imagery, overfitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review