Cited by 137Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotion Processing Influences Working Memory Circuits in Pediatric Bipolar Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Open access
Passarotti, Alessandra M., Sweeney, John A., Pavuluri, Mani N.·2010·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study examined how working memory circuits are affected by face emotion processing in pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Methods A total of 23 patients with PBD, 14 patients with ADHD, and 19 healthy control (HC) subjects (mean age, 13.36 ± 2.55 years) underwent an affective, two-back fMRI task with blocks of happy, angry, and neutral faces.Results For angry versus neutral faces PBD patients, relative to ADHD patients, exhibited increased activation in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and orbitofrontal cortex, and reduced activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and premotor cortex. Relative to the HC group, the PBD group showed no increased activation and reduced activation at the junction of DLPFC and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). Relative to HC, the ADHD patients exhibited greater activation in the DLPFC and reduced activation in the ventral and medial PFC, pregenual ACC, striatum, and temporo-parietal regions. For happy versus neutral faces, relative to the ADHD group, the PBD group exhibited greater activation in the bilateral caudate, and relative to the HC group the ADHD group showed increased activation in the DLPFC, striatal, and parietal regions, and no reduced activation. The ADHD group, compared with the HC group, showed no reduced activation and increased activation in regions that were underactive for the angry face condition.Conclusions Relative to the ADHD group, the PBD group exhibited greater deployment of the emotion-processing circuitry and reduced deployment of working memory circuitry. Commonalities across PBD and ADHD patients, relative to the HC individuals, entailed cortico-subcortical activity that was reduced under negative emotional challenge and increased under positive emotional challenge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.07.009

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 91 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–137 of 137

Metadata

Authors
Passarotti, A. M., Sweeney, J. A., & Pavuluri, M. N.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Passarotti, Alessandra M.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
49
Issue
10
Pages
1064-1080
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964377208
Cited by
137
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center for Research Resources (K23RR018638, K23 RR 18638-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
pediatric bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, working memory, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, cortico-subcortical circuits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Bipolar Disorder, Brain, Brain Mapping, Caudate Nucleus, Child, Corpus Striatum, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review