Cited by 107Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Differential engagement of cognitive and affective neural systems in pediatric bipolar disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Open access
PASSAROTTI, ALESSANDRA M., SWEENEY, JOHN A., PAVULURI, MANI N.·2010·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

This fMRI study investigates the neural bases of cognitive control of emotion processing in pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Seventeen un-medicated PBD patients, 15 un-medicated ADHD patients, and 14 healthy controls (HC) (mean age = 13.78 +/- 2.47) performed an emotional valence Stroop Task, requiring them to match the color of an emotionally valenced word to the color of either of two adjacent circles. Both patient groups responded significantly slower than HC, but there were no group differences in accuracy. A voxel-wise analysis of variance on brain activation revealed a significant interaction of group by word valence [F(2,41) = 4.44; p = .02]. Similar group differences were found for negative and positive words. For negative versus neutral words, both patient groups exhibited greater activation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and parietal cortex relative to HC. The PBD group exhibited greater activation in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) relative to HC. The ADHD group exhibited decreased VLPFC activation relative to HC and the PBD group. During cognitive control of emotion processing, PBD patients deployed the VLPFC to a greater extent than HC. The ADHD patients showed decreased VLPFC engagement relative to both HC and PBD patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617709991019

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two independent studies using the emotional Stroop task found hypoactivation in ADHD in right medial and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex while processing negative distractors but hyperactivation in left medial prefrontal cortex while processing positive distractors.

    “Similarly, two independent studies using the emotional Stroop task found hypoactivation in ADHD in right medial and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex while processing negative distractors but hyperactivation in left medial prefrontal cortex while processing positive distractors (92, 108).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV 1994 4th ed. Washington, DC American Psychiatric Association Press
  2. DuPaul GJ Power TJ Anastopulous AD Reid R ADHD Rating Scale, Vol. IV 1998 New York Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PASSAROTTI, A. M., SWEENEY, J. A., & PAVULURI, M. N.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
PASSAROTTI, ALESSANDRA M.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2009-10-22
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
106-117
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2136737488
Cited by
107
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Dana Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Center for Research Resources (K23RR018638)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
pediatric bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cognitive emotion regulation, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, parietal cortex, emotional processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Bipolar Disorder, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Cognition Disorders, Color Perception, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Pediatrics, Photic Stimulation, Predictive Value of Tests, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review