Cited by 137Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Abnormal Amygdalar Activation and Connectivity in Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Open access
Posner, Jonathan, Nagel, Bonnie J., Maia, Tiago V., Mechling, Anna, Oh, Milim, Wang, Zhishun, Peterson, Bradley S.·2011·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Emotional reactivity is one of the most disabling symptoms associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We aimed to identify neural substrates associated with emotional reactivity and to assess the effects of stimulants on those substrates. Method We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess neural activity in adolescents with (n = 15) and without (n = 15) ADHD while they performed a task involving the subliminal presentation of fearful faces. Using dynamic causal modeling, we also examined the effective connectivity of two regions associated with emotional reactivity, i.e., the amygdala and the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC). The participants with ADHD underwent scanning both on and off stimulant medication in a counterbalanced fashion. Results During the task, we found that activity in the right amygdala was greater in adolescents with ADHD than in control subjects. In addition, in adolescents with ADHD, greater connectivity was detected between the amygdala and LPFC. Stimulants had a normalizing effect on both the activity in the right amygdala and the connectivity between the amygdala and LPFC. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that in adolescents with ADHD, a neural substrate of fear processing is atypical, as is the connectivity between the amygdala and LPFC. These findings suggest possible neural substrates for the emotional reactivity that is often present in youths with ADHD, and provide putative neural targets for the development of novel therapeutic interventions for this condition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.05.010

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Larger studies find amygdala hyperactivation in ADHD during both subliminal perception of fearful expressions and while subjects rated their fear of neutral faces, although results are mixed.

    “The larger studies find amygdala hyperactivation in ADHD, during both the subliminal perception of fearful expressions and while subjects rated their fear of neutral faces, although results are mixed (24, 29, 95-98)-Table 2 and Supplemental Material.”

    From Emotion Dysregulation in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2014) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Discussion reports amygdalar hyperactivation during subliminal fearful-face presentation in unmedicated youths with ADHD and describes a separate study finding hyperactivation when participants rated fear in neutral faces. But this paper calls its own sample small (15 ADHD participants), so it does not support describing it as a larger study; it also does not establish that results across studies were mixed. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent neuropsychological studies have found demonstrable, consistent impairments in sustained focus difficult to demonstrate in ADHD, at least in the laboratory setting.

    “The central role of an attentional deficit in ADHD has been questioned by recent neuropsychological studies [21, 26] in which demonstrable, consistent impairments in sustained focus have been difficult to demonstrate, at least in the laboratory setting.”

    From Using Stimulants to Treat ADHD-Related Emotional Lability (2014) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction discusses inattention as a characteristic of ADHD and says the fearful-face task was designed to limit attention differences as a confound. The Method describes an fMRI task, not a test of sustained focus. Searches for sustained-focus impairments and neuropsychological attention findings found no passage addressing whether such impairments are difficult to demonstrate in laboratory studies. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [1]Barkley R Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment 3rd New York Guilford Press 2005
  2. [2]Barkley R Fischer M The unique contribution of emotional impulsiveness to impairment in major life activities in hyperactive children as adults Journal of the American Acadamy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49 5 503 513 20431470
  3. [3]Chronis-Tuscano A Molina BSG Pelham WE Very Early Predictors of Adolescent Depression and Suicide Attempts in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Archives of general psychiatry 2010 67 10 1044 20921120 PMC3382065
  4. [4]Biederman J Newcorn J Sprich S Comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with conduct, depressive, anxiety, and other disorders American Journal of Psychiatry 1991 148 5 564 577 2018156
  5. [5]Whalen PJ Rauch SL Etcoff NL McInerney SC Lee MB Jenike MA Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge J Neurosci Jan 1 1998 18 1 411 418 9412517 PMC6793390
  6. [8]Brotman M Rich B Guyer A Amygdala activation during emotion processing of neutral faces in children with severe mood dysregulation versus ADHD or bipolar disorder American Journal of Psychiatry 2010 167 1 61 19917597 PMC3075433
  7. [9]Pessoa L Ungerleider LG Neuroimaging studies of attention and the processing of emotion-laden stimuli Progress in Brain Research 2004 144 171 182 14650848
  8. [10]Friston K Harrison L Penny W Dynamic causal modelling NeuroImage 2003 19 4 1273 1302 12948688
  9. [12]Ongur D Price J The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans Cerebral Cortex 2000 10 3 206 10731217
  10. [13]Barbas H Zikopoulos B Timbie C Sensory Pathways and Emotional Context for Action in Primate Prefrontal Cortex Biological psychiatry 2010 20889144
  11. [14]Gehring WJ Knight RT Lateral prefrontal damage affects processing selection but not attention switching Cognitive Brain Research 2002 13 2 267 279 11958971
  12. [15]Rosenkranz JA Grace AA Dopamine attenuates prefrontal cortical suppression of sensory inputs to the basolateral amygdala of rats The Journal of Neuroscience 2001 21 11 4090 11356897 PMC6762693
  13. [16]Rosenkranz JA Grace AA Cellular mechanisms of infralimbic and prelimbic prefrontal cortical inhibition and dopaminergic modulation of basolateral amygdala neurons in vivo The Journal of Neuroscience 2002 22 1 324 11756516 PMC6757602
  14. [17]Lucas C Zhang H Fisher P The DISC Predictive Scales (DPS): Efficiently screening for diagnoses Journal of Amer Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2001 40 4 443 11314570
  15. [18]Shaffer D Schwab-Stone M Fisher P The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised version (DISC-R): I. Preparation, field testing, interrater reliability, and acceptability Journal of American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 1993 32 3 643 8496128
  16. [19]Conners C Sitarenios G Parker J Epstein J The revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity Journal of abnormal child psychology 1998 26 4 257 268 9700518
  17. [22]Oldfield R The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory Neuropsychologia 1971 9 1 97 113 5146491
  18. [24]Kovacs M The Children's Depression, Inventory (CDI) Psychopharmacology bulletin 1985 21 4 995 998 4089116
  19. [25]Spielberger C Gorsuch R STAI manual for the State-trait anxiety inventory Consulting Psychologists Press 1970
  20. [26]Petersen A Crockett L Richards M Boxer A A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1988 17 2 117 133 24277579
  21. [29]Mechelli A Price C Noppeney U Friston K A dynamic causal modeling study on category effects: Bottom-up or top-down mediation? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003 15 7 925 934 14628754
  22. [30]Stephan K Weiskopf N Drysdale P Robinson P Friston K Comparing hemodynamic models with DCM NeuroImage 2007 38 3 387 401 17884583 PMC2636182
  23. [31]Friston K Causal modelling and brain connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging PLoS Biol 2009 7 2 e1000033 PMC2642881 19226186
  24. [32]Cox R AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages Computers and Biomedical Research 1996 29 3 162 173 8812068
  25. [33]Findling R Ginsberg L Jain R Gao J Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an open-label, dose-optimization study Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology 2009 19 6 649 662 20035583
  26. [34]Volkow N Wang G Newcorn J Depressed dopamine activity in caudate and preliminary evidence of limbic involvement in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Archives of general psychiatry 2007 64 8 932 17679638
  27. [35]Almeida J Versace A Mechelli A Abnormal amygdala-prefrontal effective connectivity to happy faces differentiates bipolar from major depression Biological psychiatry 2009 66 5 451 459 19450794 PMC2740996
  28. [38]Barkley R ADHD and the Nature of Self-Control New York Guilford Press 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Posner, J., Nagel, B. J., Maia, T. V., Mechling, A., Oh, M., Wang, Z., & Peterson, B. S.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Posner, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
50
Issue
8
Pages
828-837.e3
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089152995
Cited by
137
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh074677-05)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P60AA010760)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH091249, K02-MH-074677)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K08 NS52147, K08NS052147)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adolescents, amygdala, lateral prefrontal cortex, emotional reactivity, fear processing, stimulant medication, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Amygdala, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Fear, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Neural Conduction, Subliminal Stimulation, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review