Cited by 61Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Delay aversion in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder is mediated by amygdala and prefrontal cortex hyper‐activation

Open access
Van Dessel, Jeroen, Sonuga‐Barke, Edmund, Mies, Gabry, Lemiere, Jurgen, Van der Oord, Saskia, Morsink, Sarah, Danckaerts, Marina·2018·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Experimental research supports delay aversion as a motivational feature of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ). To investigate the neurobiology of delay aversion in ADHD , this study examined whether adolescents with ADHD display an unusually strong activation in affective brain regions in response to cues predicting forthcoming delay and whether these effects are (a) delay‐dose dependent and (b) statistically mediate the association between ADHD and self‐reported delay aversion. Methods: Twenty‐nine right‐handed male adolescents with combined type ADHD and 32 typically developing controls (ages 10–18 years) performed a reaction time task in an MRI scanner. Pretarget cues indicated delay‐related response consequences. One indicated that delay would follow the response irrespective of response speed ( CERTAIN DELAY ), a second that delay would only follow if the response was too slow ( CONDITIONAL DELAY ), and a third that no delay would follow the response whatever its speed ( NO DELAY ). Delay levels were 2, 6, or 14 s. Participants also rated their own delay aversion in everyday life. Results: Individuals with ADHD rated themselves as more delay averse than controls. Significantly greater activation to CERTAIN DELAY cues relative to NO DELAY cues was found in participants with ADHD compared to controls (bilaterally) in amygdala, anterior insula, temporal pole, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex ( DLPFC ), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Amygdala and DLPFC activation strength were strongly and delay‐dose dependently correlated with delay aversion ratings, and statistically mediated the relationship between ADHD status and delay aversion. Conclusions: When presented with cues predicting impending delay, adolescents with ADHD , relative to controls, displayed a delay‐related increase in activation in amygdala and DLPFC , regions known to be implicated in the processing of aversive events. Future studies should examine the specificity of these effects to delay aversion compared to aversive events in general.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12868

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dysregulation in the mesolimbic pathway is linked to altered reward processing and delay aversion characteristic of ADHD.

    “dysregulation in the mesolimbic pathway is linked to altered reward processing and the “delay aversion” characteristic of ADHD”

    From ADHD in Adulthood: Clinical Presentation, Comorbidities, and Treatment Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes a theoretical account linking altered reward circuits and ventral-striatal responses to an immediate-reward preference that can lead to delay aversion in ADHD. It does not identify this as dysregulation of the mesolimbic pathway. The study’s reported findings instead concern amygdala and prefrontal activation in response to delay cues. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individuals with ADHD experience relatively strong negative emotions during waiting times, resulting in a preference to escape delay.

    “it has been shown that individuals with ADHD experience relatively strong negative emotions during waiting times, resulting in a preference to escape delay”

    From Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Van Dessel et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Oosterlaan, J., Baeyens, D., Scheres, A., Antrop, I., Roeyers, H., & Sergeant, J.A. (2008). Editing of the disruptive behavior disorders rating scale of Pelham, Gnagy, Green- slade & Milich. Pearson, Amsterdam.
  2. Pelham Jr, W.E., Gnagy, E.M., Greenslade, K.E., & Milich, R. (1992). Teacher ratings of DMS-III-R symptoms for the disruptive behaviour disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 1177.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Dessel, J., Sonuga‐Barke, E., Mies, G., Lemiere, J., Van der Oord, S., Morsink, S., & Danckaerts, M.
Affiliations
  • Center for Developmental Psychiatry UPC ‐ KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience Kings College London London UK
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Clinical Psychology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-10
Volume
59
Issue
8
Pages
888-899
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2793343101
Cited by
61
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (11.ZU.117N, G.0821.11N)
  • KU Leuven (OT/12/096)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, delay aversion, amygdala, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, adolescents, motivation, reaction time task
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amygdala, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Reaction Time, Prefrontal Cortex, Delay Discounting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review