Cited by 115Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta-analysis: Are Psychotherapies Less Effective for Black Youth in Communities With Higher Levels of Anti-Black Racism?

Open access
Price, Maggi A., Weisz, John R., McKetta, Sarah, Hollinsaid, Nathan L., Lattanner, Micah R., Reid, Allecia E., Hatzenbuehler, Mark L.·2022·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To examine whether anti-Black cultural racism moderates the efficacy of psychotherapy interventions among youth.Method A subset of studies from a previous meta-analysis of 5 decades of youth psychotherapy randomized controlled trials was analyzed. Studies were published in English between 1963 and 2017 and identified through a systematic search. The 194 studies (N = 14,081 participants; age range, 2-19) across 34 states comprised 2,678 effect sizes (ESs) measuring mental health problems (eg, depression) targeted by interventions. Anti-Black cultural racism was operationalized using a composite index of 31 items measuring explicit racial attitudes (obtained from publicly available sources, eg, General Social Survey) aggregated to the state level and linked to the meta-analytic database. Analyses were conducted with samples of majority-Black (ie, ≥50% Black) (n = 36 studies) and majority-White (n = 158 studies) youth.Results Two-level random-effects meta-regression analyses indicated that higher anti-Black cultural racism was associated with lower ESs for studies with majority-Black youth (β = -0.2, 95% CI [-0.35, -0.04], p = .02) but was unrelated to ESs for studies with majority-White youth (β = 0.0004, 95% CI [-0.03, 0.03], p = .98), controlling for relevant area-level covariates. In studies with majority-Black youth, mean ESs were significantly lower in states with the highest anti-Black cultural racism (>1 SD above the mean; Hedges' g = 0.19) compared with states with the lowest racism (<1 SD below the mean; Hedges' g = 0.60).Conclusion Psychotherapies tested with samples of majority-Black youth were significantly less effective in states with higher (vs lower) levels of anti-Black cultural racism, suggesting that anti-Black cultural racism may be one contextual moderator of treatment effect heterogeneity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.07.808

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Price, 2021, Cultural sexism moderates efficacy of psychological therapy for girls: Results from a spatial meta-analysis, Clin Psychol (New York)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 115

Metadata

Authors
Price, M. A., Weisz, J. R., McKetta, S., Hollinsaid, N. L., Lattanner, M. R., Reid, A. E., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Price, Maggi A.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
754-763
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3192483033
Cited by
115
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2022-11-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University College London
  • American Psychological Foundation
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R305B170019)
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH093511, MH068806, MH085963, T32MH013043)
  • U.S. Department of Education
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Annie E. Casey Foundation
  • William T. Grant Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychotherapy effectiveness, Black youth, racial attitudes, treatment effect heterogeneity, contextual moderators, youth mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Black or African American, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Psychotherapy, Young Adult, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review