Cited by 121Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFire effects on ecosystems

Modified method for proximate analysis of biochars

Open access
Aller, Deborah, Bakshi, Santanu, Laird, David A.·2017·Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.01.012

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aller, D., Bakshi, S., & Laird, D. A.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Laird, David A.
Venue
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
124
Pages
335-342
ISSN
0165-2370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2576745779
Cited by
121
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
  • National Science Foundation (EPS-1101284)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
biochar, proximate analysis, volatile matter, fixed carbon, ash content, moisture content, sample oxidation, boundary temperature, biochar stability, soil amendment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review