Cited by 59Cardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Follistatin like 1 regulates hypertrophy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Open access
Tanaka, Komei, Valero-Muñoz, María, Wilson, Richard M., Essick, Eric E., Fowler, Conor T., Nakamura, Kazuto, van den Hoff, Maurice, Ouchi, Noriyuki +1 more·2016·JACC Basic to Translational Science

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for ∼50% of all clinical presentations of heart failure, (HF) and its prevalence is expected to increase. However, there are no evidence-based therapies for HFpEF; thus, HFpEF represents a major unmet need. Although hypertension is the single most important risk factor for HFpEF, with a prevalence of 60% to 89% from clinical trials and human HF registries, blood pressure therapy alone is insufficient to prevent and treat HFpEF. Follistatin-like 1 (Fstl1), a divergent member of the follistatin family of extracellular glycoproteins, has previously been shown to be elevated in HF with reduced ejection fraction and associated with increased left ventricular mass. In this study, blood levels of Fstl1 were increased in humans with HFpEF. This increase was also evident in mice with hypertension-induced HFpEF and adult rat ventricular myocytes stimulated with aldosterone. Treatment with recombinant Fstl1 abrogated aldosterone-induced cardiac myocyte hypertrophy, suggesting a role for Fstl1 in the regulation of hypertrophy in HFpEF. There was also a reduction in the E/A ratio, a measure of diastolic dysfunction. Furthermore, HFpEF induced in a mouse model that specifically ablates Fstl1 in cardiac myocytes (cardiac myocyte-specific Fstl1 knockout [cFstl1-KO]) showed exacerbation of HFpEF with worsened diastolic dysfunction. In addition, cFstl1-KO-HFpEF mice demonstrated more marked cardiac myocyte hypertrophy with increased molecular markers of atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide expression. These findings indicate that Fstl1 exerts therapeutic effects by modulating cardiac hypertrophy in HFpEF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.04.002

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High concentrations of FSTL1 are seen in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure.

    “high concentrations of FSTL1 are seen in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure (196, 197)”

    From Muscle–Organ Crosstalk: The Emerging Roles of Myokines (2020) · cites this paper as [197]

  • Circulating levels of FSTL1 may work as a biomarker.

    “Circulating levels of FSTL1 may work as a biomarker as high concentrations of FSTL1 are seen in patients with systolic and diastolic heart failure (196, 197), and as FSTL1 levels exhibit prognostic significance in the acute coronary syndrome (198).”

    From Muscle–Organ Crosstalk: The Emerging Roles of Myokines (2020) · cites this paper as [197]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanaka, K., Valero-Muñoz, M., Wilson, R. M., Essick, E. E., Fowler, C. T., Nakamura, K., van den Hoff, M., Ouchi, N., & Sam, F.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sam, Flora
Venue
JACC Basic to Translational Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
207-221
ISSN
2452-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2473248170
Cited by
59
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC Basic to Translational Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL117153)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
FSTL1, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, cardiac hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, aldosterone, hypertension, cardiomyocytes, atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review