Cited by 49Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Differences in mechanisms and outcomes of syncope in patients with coronary disease or idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by electrophysiologic testing

Open access
Brembilla-Perrot, Béatrice, Suty-Selton, Christine, Beurrier, Daniel, Houriez, Pierre, Nippert, Marc, Terrier de la Chaise, Arnaud, Louis, Pierre, Claudon, Olivier +4 more·2004·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study evaluated the causes of syncope and the significance and differences in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, coronary disease, and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).Background Risk stratification of and indications for an automated defibrillator could differ according to the cause of LV dysfunction.Methods Electrophysiologic study, including atrial and ventricular programmed stimulation, was performed in 119 patients with coronary disease (group I) and 61 patients with DCM (group II) with an left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% and syncope. Patients were followed from one to six years (mean 4 +/- 2 years).Results Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was induced in 44 group I patients (37%) and 13 group II patients (21%); ventricular flutter (>270 beats/min) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced in 24 group I patients (19%) and 9 group II patients (15%); and various other arrhythmias were identified. Syncope remained unexplained in 34 group I patients (30%) and 16 group II patients (27%). Prognosis depended on the heart disease: VT or VF induction was a predictive factor of mortality in coronary disease and identified a group with high cardiac mortality (46%), compared with patients with a negative study, who had a lower mortality (6%; p < 0.001) than in other studies. Cardiac mortality was only correlated with LVEF in DCM.Conclusions Various causes could explain syncope in 70% of patients with coronary disease and DCM, but differences were noted: VT was frequent in coronary disease with a bad prognosis, and ischemia could explain syncope; in DCM, different causes such as atrial tachycardia could be responsible for syncope, but the prognosis only depended on LVEF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.075

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac ischaemia-related syncope is confirmed when syncope presents with evidence of acute myocardial ischaemia with or without myocardial infarction.

    “Cardiac ischaemia-related syncope is confirmed when syncope presents with evidence of acute myocardial ischaemia with or without myocardial infarction. 25-39”
  • Arrhythmic syncope is highly probable when the ECG shows persistent sinus bradycardia <40 b.p.m. or sinus pauses >3 s in awake state and in absence of physical training; Mobitz II second- and third-degree AV block; alternating left and right BBB; VT or rapid paroxysmal SVT.

    “Arrhythmic syncope is highly probable when the ECG shows 25-39 : • Persistent sinus bradycardia <40 b.p.m. or sinus pauses >3 s in awake state and in absence of physical training; • Mobitz II second- and third-degree AV block; • Alternating left and right BBB; • VT or rapid paroxysmal SVT;”
  • Data from observational studies in selected cohorts show a high rate of occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, ICD discharge, and death in patients with a history of unexplained syncope, but owing to a lack of control groups are unable to show the benefit of an ICD.

    “Data from observational studies in selected cohorts show a high rate of occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, ICD discharge, and death in patients with a history of unexplained syncope but, owing to a lack of control groups, are unable to show the benefit of an ICD. 27,28,359,360”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brembilla-Perrot, B., Suty-Selton, C., Beurrier, D., Houriez, P., Nippert, M., Terrier de la Chaise, A., Louis, P., Claudon, O., Andronache, M., Abdelaah, A., Sadoul, N., & Juillière, Y.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
Corresponding author
Brembilla-Perrot, Béatrice
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
594-601
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021441438
Cited by
49
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
syncope, coronary disease, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, left ventricular dysfunction, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular flutter, programmed electrical stimulation, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac mortality, prognosis, atrial tachycardia, ischemia
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiomyopathy, Dilated, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Stroke Volume, Syncope, Ventricular Fibrillation, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Defibrillators, Implantable, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review