Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 915

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Vivo 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Provides a Noninvasive Measure of Carotid Plaque Inflammation in Patients

Open access
Tawakol, Ahmed, Migrino, Raymond Q., Bashian, Gregory G., Bedri, Shahinaz, Vermylen, David, Cury, Ricardo C., Yates, Denise, LaMuraglia, Glenn M., Furie, Karen, Houser, Stuart, Gewirtz, Henry, Muller, James E., Brady, Thomas J., Fischman, Alan J.·2006·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Given the importance of inflammation in atherosclerosis, we sought to determine if atherosclerotic plaque inflammation could be measured noninvasively in humans using positron emission tomography (PET). BACKGROUND Earlier PET studies using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) demonstrated increased FDG uptake in atherosclerotic plaques. Here we tested the ability of FDG-PET to measure carotid plaque inflammation in patients who subsequently underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS Seventeen patients with severe carotid stenoses underwent FDG-PET imaging 3 h after FDG administration (13 to 25 mCi), after which carotid plaque FDG uptake was determined as the ratio of plaque to blood activity (target to background ratio, TBR). Less than 1 month after imaging, subjects underwent CEA, after which carotid specimens were processed to identify macrophages (staining with anti-CD68 antibodies). RESULTS There was a significant correlation between the PET signal from the carotid plaques and the macrophage staining from the corresponding histologic sections (r = 0.70; p < 0.0001). When mean FDG uptake (mean TBR) was compared with mean inflammation (mean percentage CD68 staining) for each of the 17 patients, the correlation was even stronger (r = 0.85; p < 0.0001). Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake did not correlate with plaque area, plaque thickness, or area of smooth muscle cell staining. CONCLUSIONS We established that FDG-PET imaging can be used to assess the severity of inflammation in carotid plaques in patients. If subsequent natural history studies link increased FDG-PET activity in carotid arteries with clinical events, this noninvasive measure could be used to identify a subset of patients with carotid atherosclerosis in need of intensified medical therapy or carotid artery intervention to prevent stroke.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.076

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 915

Metadata

Authors
Tawakol, A., Migrino, R. Q., Bashian, G. G., Bedri, S., Vermylen, D., Cury, R. C., Yates, D., LaMuraglia, G. M., Furie, K., Houser, S., Gewirtz, H., Muller, J. E., Brady, T. J., & Fischman, A. J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
1818-1824
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072242219
Cited by
915
References
29
FWCI
30.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Provides a Noninvasive Measure of Carotid Plaque Inflammation in Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.076
The paper
Tawakol, A., Migrino, R. Q., Bashian, G. G., Bedri, S., Vermylen, D., Cury, R. C., Yates, D., LaMuraglia, G. M., Furie, K., Houser, S., Gewirtz, H., Muller, J. E., Brady, T. J., & Fischman, A. J. (2006). In Vivo 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Provides a Noninvasive Measure of Carotid Plaque Inflammation in Patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.076

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.