Cited by 233Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionClinical practice guidelines implementation

Cardiovascular Protection Using Beta-Blockers

Open access
Bangalore, Sripal, Messerli, Franz H., Kostis, John B., Pepine, Carl J.·2007·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

For more than 3 decades, beta-blockers have been widely used in the treatment of hypertension and are still recommended as first-line agents by national and international guidelines. Recent meta-analyses indicate that, in patients with uncomplicated hypertension, compared with other antihypertensive agents, first-line therapy with beta-blockers was associated with an increased risk of stroke, especially in the elderly cohort with no benefit for the end points of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality. In this review, we critically analyze the evidence supporting the use of beta-blockers in patients with hypertension and evaluate evidence for its role in other indications. The review of the currently available literature shows that in patients with uncomplicated hypertension, there is a paucity of data or absence of evidence to support use of beta-blockers as monotherapy or as first-line agents. Given the increased risk of stroke, their "pseudo-antihypertensive" efficacy (failure to lower central aortic pressure), lack of effect on regression of target end organ effects like left ventricular hypertrophy and endothelial dysfunction, and numerous adverse effects, the risk benefit ratio for beta-blockers is not acceptable for this indication. However, beta-blockers remain very efficacious agents for the treatment of heart failure, certain types of arrhythmia, hypertropic obstructive cardiomyopathy, and in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.060

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Man- agement of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:2092-197.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bangalore, S., Messerli, F. H., Kostis, J. B., & Pepine, C. J.
Affiliations
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Messerli, Franz H.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
563-572
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W165973742
Cited by
233
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
beta-blockers, hypertension, first-line antihypertensive therapy, stroke risk, cardioprotection, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, left ventricular hypertrophy, endothelial dysfunction, adverse effects, risk-benefit ratio
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Heart Diseases, Humans, Hypertension, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review