Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 491

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Utility of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Open access
Kempf, Tibor, von Haehling, Stephan, Peter, Timo, Allhoff, Tim, Cicoira, Mariantonietta, Doehner, Wolfram, Ponikowski, Piotr, Filippatos, Gerasimos S., Rozentryt, Piotr, Drexler, Helmut, Anker, Stefan D., Wollert, Kai C.·2007·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES We explored the prognostic utility of growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND Growth differentiation factor-15 is a stress-responsive member of the transforming growth factor-beta cytokine superfamily. It has recently been observed that patients with CHF have increased circulating levels of GDF-15. The relations of GDF-15 to other biomarkers and to mortality in CHF have never been studied. METHODS Circulating levels of GDF-15 were determined by immunoradiometric assay in 455 patients with CHF with a median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 32% (interquartile range 25% to 39%). RESULTS The median GDF-15 level was 1,949 ng/l (interquartile range 1,194 to 3,577); 74.9% of the patients presented with GDF-15 levels >1,200 ng/l, the upper limit of normal in healthy elderly individuals. The GDF-15 levels were closely related to New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and to amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). The risk of death during follow-up increased with increasing quartiles of GDF-15. Mortality rates at 48 months were 10.0%, 9.4%, 33.4%, and 56.2% in the respective quartiles (p < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical variables and established biomarkers of adverse prognosis, including NT-proBNP, renal dysfunction, anemia, and hyperuricemia, GDF-15 remained an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio for 1 U in the Ln scale 2.26; 95% confidence interval 1.52 to 3.37; p < 0.001). Growth differentiation factor 15 provided prognostic information in clinically relevant patient subgroups (defined according to age, body mass index, heart failure etiology, concomitant medical therapy, renal function, and the levels of hemoglobin and uric acid) and added prognostic information to NYHA functional class, LVEF, and NT-proBNP. CONCLUSIONS Growth differentiation factor 15 is a new biomarker of the risk of death in patients with CHF that provides prognostic information beyond established clinical and biochemical markers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.091

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 491

Metadata

Authors
Kempf, T., von Haehling, S., Peter, T., Allhoff, T., Cicoira, M., Doehner, W., Ponikowski, P., Filippatos, G. S., Rozentryt, P., Drexler, H., Anker, S. D., & Wollert, K. C.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
50
Issue
11
Pages
1054-1060
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007937185
Cited by
491
References
3
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Utility of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.091
The paper
Kempf, T., von Haehling, S., Peter, T., Allhoff, T., Cicoira, M., Doehner, W., Ponikowski, P., Filippatos, G. S., Rozentryt, P., Drexler, H., Anker, S. D., & Wollert, K. C. (2007). Prognostic Utility of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.091

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.