Cited by 143Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Positive Remodeling of the Coronary Arteries Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in an Asymptomatic Population

Open access
Miao, Cuilian, Chen, Shaoguang, Macedo, Robson, Lai, Shenghan, Liu, Kiang, Li, Debiao, Wasserman, Bruce A., Vogel-Clausen, Jens +2 more·2009·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess coronary arterial remodeling as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis using coronary wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in an asymptomatic population-based cohort.Background In early atherosclerosis, compensatory enlargement of both the outer wall of the vessel as well as the lumen, termed compensatory enlargement or positive remodeling, occurs before luminal narrowing.Methods One hundred seventy-nine participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) trial were evaluated using black-blood coronary wall MRI. Coronary cross-sectional area (vessel size), lumen area, and mean wall thickness of the proximal coronary arteries were measured.Results Men had a greater vessel size, lumen area, and mean wall thickness than women (38.3 +/- 11.3 mm2 vs. 32.6 +/- 9.4 mm2, 6.7 +/- 3.2 mm2 vs. 5.3 +/- 2.4 mm2, and 2.0 +/- 0.3 mm vs. 1.9 +/- 0.3 mm, respectively, p < 0.05). No significant coronary artery narrowing was present by magnetic resonance angiography. Overall, coronary vessel size increased 25.9 mm2 per millimeter increase in coronary wall thickness, whereas lumen area increased only slightly at 3.1 mm2 for every millimeter increase in wall thickness (difference in slopes, p < 0.0001). Adjusting for age and sex, participants with an Agatston score >0 were more likely to have wall thickness >2.0 mm (odds ratio: 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 3.84).Conclusions Coronary wall MRI detected positive arterial remodeling in asymptomatic men and women with subclinical atherosclerosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.063

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miao, C., Chen, S., Macedo, R., Lai, S., Liu, K., Li, D., Wasserman, B. A., Vogel-Clausen, J., Lima, J. A. C., & Bluemke, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Bluemke, David A.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
53
Issue
18
Pages
1708-1715
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W172653803
Cited by
143
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2009-06-09)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95164-17-0-1, n01hc95165-34-0-1, n01hc95161-24-0-1, n01hc095169-003, n01hc95166-21-0-1, n01hc95162-31-0-1, n01hc95168-27-0-1, n01hc95160-18-0-1, n01hc095167-000, Z99CL999999, n01hc95163-22-0-1, n01hc95159-40-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01 HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC095169, N01 HC-95168, N01 HC95167, (N01-HC-95163, N01 HC-95161, N01 HC95165, N01HC95164, R01HL078909, N01-HC-095159, R01 HL78909, N01‐HC‐95166, N01 HC-95162, N01 HC95169)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
coronary artery remodeling, positive remodeling, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary lumen area, asymptomatic population, sex differences, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vessels, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review