Cited by 315Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Efficacy of Atorvastatin Reload in Patients on Chronic Statin Therapy Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Open access
Di Sciascio, Germano, Patti, Giuseppe, Pasceri, Vincenzo, Gaspardone, Achille, Colonna, Giuseppe, Montinaro, Antonio·2009·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study was designed to investigate whether an acute atorvastatin reload before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) protects patients receiving chronic statin therapy from periprocedural myocardial damage.Background Previous ARMYDA (Atorvastatin for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Angioplasty) studies demonstrated that short-term pre-treatment with atorvastatin reduces myocardial infarction during PCI in statin-naïve patients with both stable angina and acute coronary syndromes.Methods A total of 383 patients (age 66 +/- 10 years, 305 men) with stable angina (53%) or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (47%) and chronic statin therapy (55% atorvastatin) undergoing PCI were randomized to atorvastatin reload (80 mg 12 h before intervention, with a further 40-mg pre-procedural dose [n = 192]) or placebo (n = 191). All patients received long-term atorvastatin treatment thereafter (40 mg/day). The primary end point was 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization).Results The primary end point occurred in 3.7% of patients treated with atorvastatin reload and in 9.4% in the placebo arm (p = 0.037); this difference was mostly driven by reduction in periprocedural myocardial infarction. There was lower incidence of post-procedural creatine kinase-myocardial band and troponin-I elevation greater than the upper limit of normal in the atorvastatin arm (13% vs. 24%, p = 0.017, and 37% vs. 49%, p = 0.021, respectively). Multivariable analysis identified atorvastatin reload as a predictor of decreased risk of 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 0.80; p = 0.039), mainly in patients with acute coronary syndromes (82% relative risk reduction; p = 0.027).Conclusions The ARMYDA-RECAPTURE trial suggests that reloading with high-dose atorvastatin improves the clinical outcome of patients on chronic statin therapy undergoing PCI. These findings may support a strategy of routine reload with high-dose atorvastatin early before intervention even in the background of chronic therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.028

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ARMYDA trial showed that reloading with high-dose atorvastatin reduces periprocedural MI frequency even in patients on chronic statin therapy undergoing PCI for stable angina or low-intermediate risk ACS.

    “More recently, the Atorvastatin for Reduction of Myocardial Damage during Angioplasty (ARMYDA) 179 trial demonstrated that reloading with high dose atorvastatin reduces the frequency of periprocedural MI, even in patients receiving chronic statin therapy undergoing PCI for management of stable angina or low -intermediate risk ACS.”

    From ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias (2011) · cites this paper as [179]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Di Sciascio et al. JACC Vol. 54, No. 6, 2009 Acute Atorvastatin Reload Pre-PCI August 4, 2009:558-65

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Sciascio, G., Patti, G., Pasceri, V., Gaspardone, A., Colonna, G., & Montinaro, A.
Affiliations
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • Ospedale San Filippo Neri (IT)
  • St. Eugenio Hospital (IT)
  • Ospedale Vito Fazzi (IT)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
558-565
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W201549064
Cited by
315
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 25
FWCI
44.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
atorvastatin, statin therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, periprocedural myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events, acute coronary syndrome, stable angina, troponin I, creatine kinase myocardial band, revascularization
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Coronary Artery Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heptanoic Acids, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Pyrroles, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review