Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age-Related Changes in Aortic Arch Geometry

Open access
Redheuil, Alban, Yu, Wen-Chung, Mousseaux, Elie, Harouni, Ahmed A., Kachenoura, Nadjia, Wu, Colin O., Bluemke, David, Lima, Joao A.C.·2011·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives To define age-related geometric changes of the aortic arch and determine their relationship to central aortic stiffness and left ventricular remodeling. Background The proximal aorta has been shown to thicken, enlarge in diameter and lengthen with aging in humans. However, no systematic study has described age-related longitudinal and transversal remodeling of the aortic arch and their relationship with left ventricular mass and remodeling. Methods We studied 100 subjects (55 women, 45 men, average age: 46±16 years) free of overt cardiovascular disease using magnetic resonance imaging to determine aortic arch geometry (length, diameters, height, width and curvature), aortic arch function (local aortic distensibility and arch pulse wave velocity PWV) and left ventricular volumes and mass. Radial tonometry was used to calculate central blood pressure. Results Aortic diameters and arch length increased significantly with age. The ascending aorta increased most with age leading to aortic arch widening and decreased curvature. These geometric changes of the aortic arch were significantly related to decreased ascending aortic distensibility, increased aortic arch PWV (p<0.001) and to increased central blood pressures (p<0.001). Increased ascending aortic diameter, lengthening and decreased curvature of the aortic arch (unfolding) were all significantly associated with increased LV mass and concentric remodeling independently of age, gender, body size and central blood pressure (p<0.01). Conclusions Age-related unfolding of the aortic arch is related to increased proximal aortic stiffness in individuals without cardiovascular disease and associated with increased LV mass and mass-to-volume ratio independent of age, body size, central pressure and cardiovascular risk factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.012

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 307

Metadata

Authors
Redheuil, A., Yu, W.-C., Mousseaux, E., Harouni, A. A., Kachenoura, N., Wu, C. O., Bluemke, D., & Lima, J. A. C.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
58
Issue
12
Pages
1262-1270
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W149963136
Cited by
307
References
5
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age-Related Changes in Aortic Arch Geometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.012
The paper
Redheuil, A., Yu, W.-C., Mousseaux, E., Harouni, A. A., Kachenoura, N., Wu, C. O., Bluemke, D., & Lima, J. A. C. (2011). Age-Related Changes in Aortic Arch Geometry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.