Cited by 626Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

A Randomized Trial of Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With High Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel After Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents

Open access
Trenk, Dietmar, Stone, Gregg W., Gawaz, Meinrad, Kastrati, Adnan, Angiolillo, Dominick J., Müller, Ulrike, Richardt, Gert, Jakubowski, Joseph A. +1 more·2012·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to investigate the efficacy, safety, and antiplatelet effect of prasugrel as compared with clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Background The extent to which prasugrel can correct HTPR and improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective PCI is unknown.Methods Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with HTPR (>208 P2Y(12) reaction units [PRU] by the VerifyNow test) after elective PCI with at least 1 drug-eluting stent (DES) were randomly assigned to either prasugrel 10 mg daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Platelet reactivity of the patients on the study drug was reassessed at 3 and 6 months. The study was stopped prematurely for futility because of a lower than expected incidence of the primary endpoint.Results In 212 patients assigned to prasugrel, PRU decreased from 245 (225 to 273) (median [interquartile range]) at baseline to 80 (42 to 124) at 3 months, whereas in 211 patients assigned to clopidogrel, PRU decreased from 249 (225 to 277) to 241 (194 to 275) (p < 0.001 vs. prasugrel). The primary efficacy endpoint of cardiac death or myocardial infarction at 6 months occurred in no patient on prasugrel versus 1 on clopidogrel. The primary safety endpoint of non-coronary artery bypass graft Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding at 6 months occurred in 3 patients (1.4%) on prasugrel versus 1 (0.5%) on clopidogrel.Conclusions Switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel in patients with HTPR afforded effective platelet inhibition. However, given the low rate of adverse ischemic events after PCI with contemporary DES in stable CAD, the clinical utility of this strategy could not be demonstrated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.026

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trenk, D., Stone, G. W., Gawaz, M., Kastrati, A., Angiolillo, D. J., Müller, U., Richardt, G., Jakubowski, J. A., & Neumann, F.-J.
Affiliations
  • Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen (DE)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum München (DE)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Segeberger Kliniken (DE)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Trenk, Dietmar
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
59
Issue
24
Pages
2159-2164
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W144700851
Cited by
626
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 46
FWCI
62.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Sanofi-Aventis
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Otsuka
  • Eli Lilly Co.
  • Daiichi Sankyo
  • The Medicines Company
  • Portola
  • Accumetrics
  • Schering-Plough
  • AstraZeneca
  • Eisai
  • Boston Scientific
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
prasugrel, clopidogrel, high on-treatment platelet reactivity, percutaneous coronary intervention, drug-eluting stents, stable coronary artery disease, antiplatelet therapy, P2Y12 inhibition, VerifyNow assay, major bleeding, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, futility
MeSH terms
Prasugrel Hydrochloride, Clopidogrel, Aged, Blood Platelets, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Piperazines, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Thiophenes, Ticlopidine, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review