Cited by 615Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial

Open access
Sibbing, Dirk, Aradi, Dániel, Jacobshagen, Claudius, Gross, Lisa, Trenk, Dietmar, Geisler, Tobias, Orban, Martin, Hadamitzky, Martin +106 more·2017·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Current guidelines recommend potent platelet inhibition with prasugrel or ticagrelor for 12 months after an acute coronary syndrome managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the greatest anti-ischaemic benefit of potent antiplatelet drugs over the less potent clopidogrel occurs early, while most excess bleeding events arise during chronic treatment. Hence, a stage-adapted treatment with potent platelet inhibition in the acute phase and de-escalation to clopidogrel in the maintenance phase could be an alternative approach. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment from prasugrel to clopidogrel guided by platelet function testing (PFT).Methods In this investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, multicentre trial (TROPICAL-ACS) done at 33 sites in Europe, patients were enrolled if they had biomarker-positive acute coronary syndrome with successful PCI and a planned duration of dual antiplatelet treatment of 12 months. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an internet-based randomisation procedure with a computer-generated block randomisation with stratification across study sites to either standard treatment with prasugrel for 12 months (control group) or a step-down regimen (1 week prasugrel followed by 1 week clopidogrel and PFT-guided maintenance therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel from day 14 after hospital discharge; guided de-escalation group). The assessors were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was net clinical benefit (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or bleeding grade 2 or higher according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC]) criteria) 1 year after randomisation (non-inferiority hypothesis; margin of 30%). Analysis was intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01959451, and EudraCT, 2013-001636-22.Findings Between Dec 2, 2013, and May 20, 2016, 2610 patients were assigned to study groups; 1304 to the guided de-escalation group and 1306 to the control group. The primary endpoint occurred in 95 patients (7%) in the guided de-escalation group and in 118 patients (9%) in the control group (p non-inferiority=0·0004; hazard ratio [HR] 0·81 [95% CI 0·62-1·06], p superiority=0·12). Despite early de-escalation, there was no increase in the combined risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in the de-escalation group (32 patients [3%]) versus in the control group (42 patients [3%]; p non-inferiority=0·0115). There were 64 BARC 2 or higher bleeding events (5%) in the de-escalation group versus 79 events (6%) in the control group (HR 0·82 [95% CI 0·59-1·13]; p=0·23).Interpretation Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment was non-inferior to standard treatment with prasugrel at 1 year after PCI in terms of net clinical benefit. Our trial shows that early de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment can be considered as an alternative approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome managed with PCI.Funding Klinikum der Universität München, Roche Diagnostics, Eli Lilly, and Daiichi Sankyo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32155-4

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RCTs on shorter DAPT duration followed by ASA or a P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy are relatively small, often with non-inferiority design for efficacy, relatively low power, and wide noninferiority margins.

    “since RCTs on shorter DAPT duration followed by ASA or a P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy are relatively small, often with non-inferiority design for efficacy, relatively low power, and wide noninferiority margins.”
  • No evidence supports shortening or de-escalating DAPT post-ACS specifically in patients with diabetes.

    “No evidence supports shortening or de-escalating DAPT post-ACS specifically in patients with diabetes”
  • These RCTs had primary endpoints combining minor bleeding with traditional efficacy outcomes, efficacy outcomes including not only MACE, and diabetes sub-groups that contain few patients and events, especially on the major hard endpoints.

    “In addition, these RCTs had primary endpoints combining minor bleeding with traditional efficacy outcomes, efficacy outcomes including not only MACE, and diabetes sub-groups that contain few patients and events, especially on the major hard endpoints”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Sibbing D, Aradi D, Jacobshagen C, et al. A randomised trial on platelet functionguided deescalation of antiplatelet treatment in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Rationale and design of the Testing Responsiveness to Platelet Inhibition on Chronic Antiplatelet Treatment for Acute Coronary Syndromes (TROPICALACS) Trial. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117: 188-95.
  2. Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for STelevation myocardial infarction (TRITONTIMI 38): doubleblind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 723-31.
  3. Stone GW. Ischaemia versus bleeding: the art of clinical decisionmaking. Lancet 2009; 373: 695-96.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sibbing, D., Aradi, D., Jacobshagen, C., Gross, L., Trenk, D., Geisler, T., Orban, M., Hadamitzky, M., Merkely, B., Kiss, R. G., Komócsi, A., Dézsi, C. A., Holdt, L., Felix, S. B., Parma, R., Klopotowski, M., Schwinger, R. H. G., Rieber, J., Huber, K., Neumann, F.-J., Koltowski, L., Mehilli, J., Huczek, Z., Massberg, S., Parma, R., Parma, Z., Lesiak, M., Komosa, A., Huczek, Z., Koltowski, L., Kowara, M., Rymuza, B., Klopotowski, M., Malek, L., Aradi, D., Veress, G., Dézsi, A. D., Merkely, B., Lux, Á., Kiss, R. G., Papp, J., Kovács, A., Dézsi, C. A., Amer, S., Ruzsa, Z., Róna, S., Komócsi, A., Ili, R., Ungi, I., Nagy, F., Zweiker, R., Tóth-Gayor, G., Huber, K., Haller, P., von Scheidt, W., Blüthgen, A., Neumann, F.-J., Trenk, D., Leggewie, S., Kreider-Stempfle, H. U., Remp, T., Kara, K., Mügge, A., Wutzler, A., Fichtlscherer, S., Zeiher, A. M., Seeger, F., Hinterseer, M., König, A., Lederle, S., Jacobshagen, C., Czepluch, F., Maier, L., Schillinger, W., Sossalla, S., Hummel, A., Felix, S., Karakas, M., Sydow, K., Rudolph, T., Halbach, M., Gori, T., Münzel, T., May, A., Gerstenberg, C.-M., Pilecky, D., Rieber, J., Deichstetter, M., Sibbing, D., Mehilli, J., Gross, L., Kääb, S., Löw, A., Orban, M., Orban, M., Sattler, S., Deuschl, S., Teupser, D., Holdt, L., Mudra, H., Räder, T., Schütz, T., Vahldiek, F., Divchev, D., Ince, H., Nienaber, C. A., Radunski, H., Boekstegers, P., Horstkotte, J., Mueller, R., Geisler, T., Müller, K., Schwinger, R., & Rasp, O.
Affiliations
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum München (DE)
  • German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE)
  • Medical University of Silesia (PL)
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • Klinikum Weiden (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
390
Issue
10104
Pages
1747-1757
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2748517697
Cited by
615
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 18
FWCI
50.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • Daiichi Sankyo Company
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
antiplatelet therapy de-escalation, acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary intervention, prasugrel, clopidogrel, platelet function testing, dual antiplatelet therapy, bleeding risk, non-inferiority, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding complications
MeSH terms
Prasugrel Hydrochloride, Clopidogrel, Drug Administration Schedule, Europe, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Platelet Function Tests, Ticlopidine, Drug Monitoring, Stroke, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review