Cited by 595Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Risk of Aortic Valve Stenosis in the General Population

Open access
Kamstrup, Pia R., Tybjærg-Hansen, Anne, Nordestgaard, Børge G.·2014·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine whether elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and corresponding LPA risk genotypes (rs10455872, rs3798220, kringle IV type 2 repeat polymorphism) prospectively associate with increased risk of aortic valve stenosis (AVS).Background The etiologic basis of AVS is unclear. Recent data implicate an LPA genetic variant (rs10455872), associated with Lp(a) levels, in calcific AVS.Methods We combined data from 2 prospective general population studies, the Copenhagen City Heart Study (1991 to 2011; n = 10,803) and the Copenhagen General Population Study (2003 to 2011; n = 66,877), following up 77,680 Danish participants for as long as 20 years, during which time 454 were diagnosed with AVS. We conducted observational and genetic instrumental variable analyses in a Mendelian randomization study design.Results Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for AVS of 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8 to 1.7) for 22nd to 66th percentile levels (5 to 19 mg/dl), 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1 to 2.4) for 67th to 89th percentile levels (20 to 64 mg/dl), 2.0 (95% CI: 1.2 to 3.4) for 90th to 95th percentile levels (65 to 90 mg/dl), and 2.9 (95% CI: 1.8 to 4.9) for levels greater than 95th percentile (>90 mg/dl), versus levels less than the 22nd percentile (<5 mg/dl; trend, p < 0.001). Lp(a) levels were elevated among carriers of rs10455872 and rs3798220 minor alleles, and of low number of KIV-2 repeats (trend, all p < 0.001). Combining all genotypes, instrumental variable analysis yielded a genetic relative risk for AVS of 1.6 (95% CI: 1.2 to 2.1) for a 10-fold Lp(a) increase, comparable to the observational hazard ratio of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2 to 1.7) for a 10-fold increase in Lp(a) plasma levels.Conclusions Elevated Lp(a) levels and corresponding genotypes were associated with increased risk of AVS in the general population, with levels >90 mg/dl predicting a threefold increased risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.038

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent Mendelian randomization studies showed that the gene encoding apo(a), LPA, is potentially causally related to calcific aortic valve disease.

    “Recent studies that used a Mendelian randomization design showed that the gene encoding apo(a) (LPA) is potentially causally related to calcific aortic valve disease48–50.”

    From Calcific aortic stenosis (2016) · cites this paper as [49]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamstrup, P. R., Tybjærg-Hansen, A., & Nordestgaard, B. G.
Affiliations
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Nordestgaard, Børge G.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
470-477
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086153196
Cited by
595
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 2
FWCI
20.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Danish Heart Foundation
  • Danish Council for Independent Research Medical Sciences
  • IMK Almene Fund
  • Johan and Lise Boserup's Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
lipoprotein(a), aortic stenosis, rs10455872, rs3798220, genetic risk, calcific aortic valve disease, Mendelian randomization, cardiovascular risk factors, Copenhagen City Heart Study, Copenhagen General Population Study, general population cohort
MeSH terms
Aged, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Denmark, Female, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemias, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Incidence, Prevalence, Lipoprotein(a), Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review