Cited by 1,807Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipid metabolism and disorders

Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor: current status

Open access
Nordestgaard, Børge G., Chapman, M. John, Ray, Kausik, Borén, Jan, Andreotti, Felicita, Watts, Gerald F., Ginsberg, Henry, Amarenco, Pierre +11 more·2010·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of the study were, first, to critically evaluate lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a cardiovascular risk factor and, second, to advise on screening for elevated plasma Lp(a), on desirable levels, and on therapeutic strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: The robust and specific association between elevated Lp(a) levels and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD)/coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, together with recent genetic findings, indicates that elevated Lp(a), like elevated LDL-cholesterol, is causally related to premature CVD/CHD. The association is continuous without a threshold or dependence on LDL- or non-HDL-cholesterol levels. Mechanistically, elevated Lp(a) levels may either induce a prothrombotic/anti-fibrinolytic effect as apolipoprotein(a) resembles both plasminogen and plasmin but has no fibrinolytic activity, or may accelerate atherosclerosis because, like LDL, the Lp(a) particle is cholesterol-rich, or both. We advise that Lp(a) be measured once, using an isoform-insensitive assay, in subjects at intermediate or high CVD/CHD risk with premature CVD, familial hypercholesterolaemia, a family history of premature CVD and/or elevated Lp(a), recurrent CVD despite statin treatment, ≥3% 10-year risk of fatal CVD according to European guidelines, and/or ≥10% 10-year risk of fatal + non-fatal CHD according to US guidelines. As a secondary priority after LDL-cholesterol reduction, we recommend a desirable level for Lp(a) <80th percentile (less than ∼50 mg/dL). Treatment should primarily be niacin 1-3 g/day, as a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled intervention trials demonstrates reduced CVD by niacin treatment. In extreme cases, LDL-apheresis is efficacious in removing Lp(a). CONCLUSION: We recommend screening for elevated Lp(a) in those at intermediate or high CVD/CHD risk, a desirable level <50 mg/dL as a function of global cardiovascular risk, and use of niacin for Lp(a) and CVD/CHD risk reduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq386

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The risk increase associated with elevated Lp(a) was of lower magnitude than the one observed with LDL-C.

    “However, the risk increase was of lower magnitude than the one observed with LDL-C [186, 191, 192].”

    From Established and Emerging Lipid-Lowering Drugs for Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [192]

    The Epidemiology section reports that elevated Lp(a) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, including a relative risk of 1.13 for coronary heart disease per 3.5-fold higher Lp(a) level after adjustment. It does not establish that this risk increase is smaller than the increase associated with LDL-C; its discussion of LDL cholesterol concerns whether the Lp(a) association depends on LDL levels. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pro-atherogenic effects of Lp(a) are attributed to pro-coagulant effects due to its similarity to plasminogen and to pro-inflammatory effects related to its oxidized phospholipid load.

    “Pro-atherogenic effects of Lp(a) have also been attributed to pro-coagulant effects as Lp(a) has a similar structure to plasminogen, and it has pro-inflammatory effects most likely related to the oxidized phospholipid load carried by Lp(a) [71].”
  • No randomized intervention has shown that reducing lipoprotein(a) decreases cardiovascular disease risk.

    “High concentrations of Lp(a) are associated with increased risk of CHD and ischaemic stroke, although there is no randomized intervention showing that reducing Lp(a) decreases CVD risk.480”
  • High concentrations of lipoprotein(a) are associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease and ischaemic stroke.

    “High concentrations of Lp(a) are associated with increased risk of CHD and ischaemic stroke, although there is no randomized intervention showing that reducing Lp(a) decreases CVD risk.480”
  • Risk is regarded as significant when lipoprotein(a) is above the 80th percentile (50 mg/dL).

    “The risk is regarded as significant when Lp(a) is above the 80th percentile (50 mg/dL). 109”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. Goldstein JL, Hobbs HH, Brown MS. Familial hypercholesterolemia. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p2863 -2913.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nordestgaard, B. G., Chapman, M. J., Ray, K., Borén, J., Andreotti, F., Watts, G. F., Ginsberg, H., Amarenco, P., Catapano, A., Descamps, O. S., Fisher, E., Kovanen, P. T., Kuivenhoven, J. A., Lesnik, P., Masana, L., Reiner, Z., Taskinen, M.-R., Tokgözoglu, L., & Tybjærg-Hansen, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard (FR)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Hôpital de Jolimont (BE)
  • New York University (US)
  • Wihuri Research Institute (FI)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Corresponding author
Nordestgaard, Børge G.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2010-10-21
Volume
31
Issue
23
Pages
2844-2853
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2098890974
Cited by
1,807
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 145 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 140 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 131 · 2016: 145 · 2015: 115 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 78
FWCI
79.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Kowa Company
  • European Atherosclerosis Society
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL073030)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
lipoprotein(a), cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease, Lp(a) screening, niacin therapy, LDL apheresis, apolipoprotein(a), atherosclerosis, familial hypercholesterolemia, cardiovascular risk stratification
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemias, Immunoassay, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Lipoprotein(a), Patient Selection, Early Diagnosis, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review