Cited by 72Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Clinical Relevance of Exaggerated Exercise Blood Pressure

Open access
Schultz, Martin G., Otahal, Petr, Picone, Dean S., Sharman, James E.·2015·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.015

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Submaximal exercise SBP is associated with CVD outcomes (including hypertension), but the same associations are not universally observed for SBP recorded at maximal exercise intensities.

    “Consistent associations between exercise BP and hypertension-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes are observed at submaximal exercise intensity, not so with maximal exercise intensity.”

    From Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Workload, and the Blood Pressure Response to Exercise Testing (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    Figure 1 in “Clinical Relevance of Exaggerated Exercise Blood Pressure” says that all pooled analyses found a significantly increased risk of incident hypertension, whether exercise systolic BP was measured at moderate or peak intensity. The paper therefore supports the submaximal association but makes a contrary point about the claimed lack of a consistent association at maximal intensity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exaggerated exercise blood pressure (EEBP) recorded during clinical exercise testing is independently associated with blood pressure-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes.

    “Exaggerated exercise blood pressure recorded during clinical exercise testing is independently associated with blood pressure -related cardiovascular disease outcomes”
  • Recent literature is mostly unanimous that exaggerated exercise blood pressure during submaximal exercise predicts future development of hypertension in general populations without high resting blood pressure.

    “Recent literature also is mostly unanimous with respect to the utility of EEBP during submaximal exercise to predict the future development of hypertension in general populations without high resting BP (6,58).”
  • EEBP during moderate intensity exercise is associated with the development of hypertension in populations without high resting BP.

    “Indeed, EEBP during moderate intensity exercise is associated with the development of hypertension in populations without high resting BP [20,26].”
  • EEBP at submaximal exercise intensities may hold stronger associations with CVD risk.

    “with research suggesting that EEBP at submaximal exercise intensities may hold stronger associations with CVD risk [5,20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Stefanadis C. Aging, genes and environment: lessons from the Ikaria study. Hellenic J Cardiol 2013;54:237-8.
  2. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Aortic stiffness for cardio- vascular risk prediction: just measure it, just do it. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63: 647-9.
  3. The Reference Values for Aortic Stiffness' Collaboration. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'. Eur Heart J 2010;31: 2338-50.
  4. Stefanadis C, Tsiamis E, Vlachopoulos C, et al. Unfavorable effect of smoking on the elastic properties of human aorta. Circulation 1997;95:31-8.
  5. Zureik M, Czernichow S, Courbon D, et al. Parental longevity, carotid atherosclerosis, and aortic stiffness in adult offspring. Stroke 2006;37: 2702-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schultz, M. G., Otahal, P., Picone, D. S., & Sharman, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Sharman, James E.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
66
Issue
16
Pages
1843-1845
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099542648
Cited by
72
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
exercise stress testing, blood pressure measurement, cardiovascular risk assessment, hypertension, exercise-induced hypertension, patient monitoring
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Exercise Test, Humans, Hypertension, Exercise, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review