Cited by 9Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Comparison of manual and automated auscultatory blood pressure during graded exercise among people with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Moore, Myles N., Picone, Dean S., Callisaya, Michele L., Srikanth, Velandai, Sharman, James E., Schultz, Martin G.·2019·The Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Abstract

Manual measurement of blood pressure (BP) during exercise testing is the recommended standard. Automated measurement of BP is an alternative method used during clinical exercise testing, but there is little data comparing manual and automated BP in this setting. The aim of this study was to determine the concordance between manual and automated BP during a standard clinical treadmill exercise test. 416 participants (66 ± 5 years; 54% male) completed a Bruce treadmill exercise test at baseline or follow-up within a clinical trial of participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Manual and automated BP were measured simultaneously at each exercise test stage. Manual BP was measured by a technician blinded to automated BP values (Tango+, Suntech). Concordance between manual and automated BP was assessed using mean differences and intraclass correlations (ICC). Concordance between manual and automated BP across all exercise stages was excellent for systolic BP (overall mean difference: 3 ± 11 mm Hg, P = .598; ICC = 0.964 [95% CI 0.942-0.977] and pulse pressure (overall mean difference: 2 ± 14 mm Hg, P = .595; ICC = 0.934 [95% CI 0.899-0.956]). Concordance between manual and automated diastolic BP across all exercise stages was moderate-to-good (overall mean difference: 1 ± 9 mm Hg, P = .905; ICC = 0.784 [95% CI 0.672-0.858]). Automated BP using the Tango + device is concordant with manual BP during early stages of a standard clinical exercise test. Thus, this automated method may be a suitable alternative to manual measurement of BP during clinical exercise testing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jch.13717

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore, M. N., Picone, D. S., Callisaya, M. L., Srikanth, V., Sharman, J. E., & Schultz, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Peninsula Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Schultz, Martin G.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-22
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
1872-1878
ISSN
  • 1524-6175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7176
OpenAlex
W2981379212
Cited by
9
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Alzheimer's Australia Research Foundation (CF13/3559)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
automated blood pressure measurement, manual blood pressure measurement, type 2 diabetes, treadmill exercise testing, Bruce protocol, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, measurement agreement
MeSH terms
Aged, Auscultation, Automation, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Sensitivity and Specificity, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review