Cited by 267Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionSex and Gender in HealthcareCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Regarding Cardiovascular Disease in Women

Open access
Bairey Merz, C. Noel, Andersen, Holly, Sprague, Emily, Burns, Adam, Keida, Mark, Walsh, Mary Norine, Greenberger, Phyllis, Campbell, Susan +7 more·2017·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the number 1 killer of women in the United States, yet few younger women are aware of this fact. CVD campaigns focus little attention on physicians and their roles in assessing risk.Objectives In 2014, the Women's Heart Alliance (WHA) conducted a nationwide survey to determine barriers and opportunities for women and physicians with regard to CVD.Methods From September 18 to 26, 2014, a total of 1,011 U.S. women (age 25 to 60 years) were interviewed using the GfK ("Gesellschaft für Konsumforschung" Knowledge Panel). From May 6 to 12, 2014, the e-Rewards Inc. Physician and Healthcare Professional Panel surveyed 200 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 100 cardiologists.Results Overall, 45% of women were unaware that CVD is the number 1 killer of women; only 11% knew a woman who died from CVD. Overall, 45% of women reported it was common to cancel or postpone a physician appointment until losing weight. CVD was rated as the top concern by only 39% of PCPs, after weight and breast health. Only 22% of PCPs and 42% of cardiologists (p = 0.0477) felt extremely well prepared to assess CVD risk in women, while 42% and 40% felt well-prepared (p = NS), respectively. Few comprehensively implemented guidelines.Conclusions CVD was rated as the top concern less frequently than weight issues by both women and physicians. Social stigma particularly regarding body weight appeared to be a barrier. Physicians reported limited training and use of guideline assessment, whereas most supported a campaign and improved physician education. Campaigns should make CVD "real" to U.S. women, countering stereotypes with facts and validated assessments. Both community women and physicians endorsed investment in women's CVD research and physician education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.024

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bairey Merz, C. N., Andersen, H., Sprague, E., Burns, A., Keida, M., Walsh, M. N., Greenberger, P., Campbell, S., Pollin, I., McCullough, C., Brown, N., Jenkins, M., Redberg, R., Johnson, P., & Robinson, B.
Affiliations
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • St Vincent Hospital (US)
  • Society for Women's Health Research (US)
  • WomenHeart (US)
  • Association of Black Cardiologists (US)
  • American Heart Association (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Wellesley College (US)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
123-132
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2713483183
Cited by
267
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 6
FWCI
18.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-08-22)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
cardiovascular disease in women, women's cardiovascular health, cardiovascular risk assessment, physician preparedness, primary care physicians, cardiologists, health knowledge awareness, weight stigma, physician training
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Women's Health, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review