Predicting Heart Failure From 12-Lead ECGs Using AI
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) offers a scalable approach to identify individuals at risk for heart failure (HF) and guide preventive interventions. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess whether ECG-AI designed to detect systolic and diastolic dysfunction enhances the prediction of incident HF over clinical risk estimation using the PREVENT-HF (Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTs-Heart Failure) equation. METHODS: Baseline clinical and electrocardiogram data were pooled from the Framingham Heart Study, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Health Study. Participants with data sufficient for both ECG-AI and PREVENT-HF assessment were included. Analyses were performed on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute BioDataCatalyst from July to September 2025. Risk of incident HF was estimated using previously validated ECG-AI algorithms that detect systolic (ECG-AI LEF) and diastolic (ECG-AI DD) dysfunction. Discrimination and reclassification were evaluated using Harrell's C-statistic and net reclassification improvement. RESULTS: Of 14,126 participants, positive screening rates were 2.9% for ECG-AI LEF, 11.1% for ECG-AI DD, 11.9% for the composite ECG-AI model, 25.1% for PREVENT-HF score ≥10%, and 5.8% for PREVENT-HF score ≥20%. Incident HF or death occurred in 7.7% and 15.1% of participants, respectively. Participants with positive composite ECG-AI screens at baseline had 10- to 20-fold higher risk of developing HF compared with those with negative screens. At 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, the addition of ECG-AI to PREVENT-HF yielded 1-directional net reclassification improvements ranging from 0.086 to 0.125 at a PREVENT-HF threshold of 10%, and 0.327 to 0.403 at a threshold of 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ECG-AI to PREVENT-HF improved discrimination of near-term HF risk. ECG-AI may enable population-level HF risk stratification and facilitate targeted prevention strategies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At present, AI-ECG is better interpreted as a tool for risk enrichment and follow-up prioritization in selected screening settings than as a stand-alone mandate for structured surveillance or immediate pathway escalation.
“At present, AI-ECG is better interpreted as a tool for risk enrichment and follow-up prioritization in selected screening settings than as a stand-alone mandate for structured surveillance or immediate pathway escalation.12,19,44,45”
From AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions (2026) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
New creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without race
Inker, L. A., Eneanya, N. D., Coresh, J., Tighiouart, H., Wang, D., Sang, Y., Crews, D. C., Doria, A., Estrella, M. M., Froissart, M., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2102953 · Cited by 4,695 · see citing works
Development and validation of the American Heart Association’s PREVENT equations
Khan, S. S., Matsushita, K., Sang, Y., Ballew, S. H., Grams, M. E., Surapaneni, A., Blaha, M. J., Carson, A. P., Chang, A. R., Ciemins, E., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.123.067626 · Cited by 1,234 · see citing works
Khan, S. S., Coresh, J., Pencina, M. J., Ndumele, C. E., Rangaswami, J., Chow, S. L., Palaniappan, L. P., Sperling, L. S., Virani, S. S., Ho, J. E., et al. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001191 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Borlaug, B. A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.83 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled ECG for Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and Filling Pressure
Lee, E., Ito, S., Miranda, W. R., Lopez-Jimenez, F., Kane, G. C., Asirvatham, S. J., Noseworthy, P. A., Friedman, P. A., Carter, R. E., Borlaug, B. A., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00993-7 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence–Enabled Prediction of Heart Failure Risk From Single-Lead Electrocardiograms
Dhingra, L. S., Aminorroaya, A., Pedroso, A. F., Khunte, A., Sangha, V., McIntyre, D., Chow, C. K., Asselbergs, F. W., Brant, L. C. C., Barreto, S. M., et al. (2025) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0492 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Joynt Maddox KE, Elkind MSV, Aparicio HJ, et al. Forecasting the burden of cardiovascular disease and stroke in the United States through 2050- prevalence of risk factors and disease: a presi- dential advisory from the American Heart Associ- ation. Circulation. 2024;150(4):e65-e88. https:// doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001256 · DOI
- Fonarow GC, Ahmad FS, Ahmad T, et al. HF STATS 2025: heart failure epidemiology and outcomes statistics. An updated 2025 report from the Heart Failure Society of America. J Card Fail. 2025;0(0):1-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARD- FAIL.2025.07.007 · DOI
- Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(17):e263- e421. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACC.2021.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
- Khan SS, Breathett K, Braun LT, et al. Risk- based primary prevention of heart failure: a sci- entific statement from the American Heart Asso- ciation. Circulation. 2025;151(20):e1006-e1026.
- Attia ZI, Kapa S, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction us- ing an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocar- diogram. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):70-74. https://doi. org/10.1038/S41591-018-0240-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Dhandapani S, Somasundaram H, Angamuthu T. Hybrid deep learning framework for heart disease prediction using ECG signal images. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):1-17. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/S41598-025-10062-6 · DOI
- Adedinsewo DA, Siddiqui H, Johnson PW, et al. Digitizing paper based ECG files to foster deep learning based analysis of existing clinical data- sets: an exploratory analysis. Intell Based Med. 2022;6:100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. IBMED.2022.100070 · DOI
- Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FE. Epidemi- ological approaches to heart disease: the Fra- mingham Study. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1951;41(3):279-281. https://doi.org/10. 2105/AJPH.41.3.279 · DOI · Paper page
- Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, et al. The cardiovascular health study: design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol. 1991;1(3):263-276. https://doi. org/10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-W 14. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, et al. Multi- Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(9):871-881. https://doi.org/10.1093/AJE/KWF113 · DOI · Paper page
- Heinzel FR, Shah SJ. The future of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: deep phenotyp- ing for targeted therapeutics. Herz. 2022;47(4): 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00059-022- 05124-8/FIGURES/6 · DOI
- Ahalt S, Avillach P, Boyles R, et al. Building a collaborative cloud platform to accelerate heart, lung, blood, and sleep research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023;30(7):1293-1300. https://doi.org/10. 1093/JAMIA/OCAD048 · DOI
- Sussman JB, Wilson LM, Burke JF, Ziaeian B, Anderson TS. Clinical characteristics and current management of US adults at elevated risk for heart failure using the PREVENT equations: a cross-sectional analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2024;178(1):144. https://doi.org/10.7326/ ANNALS-24-01321 · DOI
- Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Steyerberg EW. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new bio- markers. Stat Med. 2011;30(1):11-21. https://doi. org/10.1002/SIM.4085 · DOI
- Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008;27 (2):157-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.2929 · DOI · Paper page
- Yao X, Rushlow DR, Inselman JW, et al. Arti- ficial intelligence-enabled electrocardiograms for identification of patients with low ejection frac- tion: a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial. Nat Med. 2021;27(5):815-819. https://doi.org/10. 1038/S41591-021-01335-4;SUBJMETA · DOI
- Siontis KC, Noseworthy PA, Attia ZI, Friedman PA. Artificial intelligence-enhanced elec- trocardiography in cardiovascular disease manage- ment. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(7):465-478. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41569-020-00503-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Khera R, Oikonomou EK, Nadkarni GN, et al. Transforming cardiovascular care with artificial intelligence: from discovery to practice: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84(1):97-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. JACC.2024.05.003 · DOI
- Akbilgic O, Butler L, Karabayir I, et al. ECG-AI: electrocardiographic artificial intelligence model for prediction of heart failure. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021;2(4):626-634. https://doi.org/10. 1093/EHJDH/ZTAB080 · DOI
- Khan SS, Ning H, Shah SJ, et al. 10-Year risk equations for incident heart failure in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(19):2388. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACC.2019.02.057 · DOI
- Kane GC, Karon BL, Mahoney DW, et al. Progression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and risk of heart failure. JAMA. 2011;306(8):856-863. https://doi.org/10.1001/ JAMA.2011.1201 · DOI
- Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, et al. The Seattle heart failure model. Circulation. 2006;113 (11):1424-1433. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCU- LATIONAHA.105.584102 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence Electrocardiogram and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Kenya
Pandey, A., Keshvani, N., Segar, M. W., Kwon, J.-M., Lee, H. S., Bhograj, C., Mashilane, K. I., Jain, N., Mwiti, W., Wambari, E., et al. (2026) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2026.0908 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationTang, Q., Deng, K., Cui, Y., Liu, H., & Qian, B. (2026) · International Journal of General Medicine · doi:10.2147/ijgm.s610298
- Authors
- Desai, A. S., Pandey, A., Suratekar, R., Ahmad, F. S., Alger, H. M., Anto, A. G., Nujum G, S., Lopez-Jimenez, F., Oh, J. K., Asfahan, S., Narasimha, S., Reddy N, S., Kaligounder, L., Ciga, M., Awasthi, S., Butler, J., Shah, S. H., & Shah, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University of Mississippi (US)
- Corresponding author
- Desai, Akshay S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JACC
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-03
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 990-1005
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4416045878
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- FNIH
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- NIH
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- heart failure prediction, 12-lead ECG, systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, risk stratification, incident heart failure, cardiovascular risk prediction, net reclassification improvement, Framingham Heart Study, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Health Study
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Cohort Studies, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review