CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Auditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFinancial Reporting and XBRL

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Withdrawn: Real effects of disclosure regulation on voluntary disclosers

Grewal, Jody·2021·Journal of Accounting and Economics
DOI 10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101390
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101390This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Albuquerque, 2019, Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence, Management Science, 65, 4451, 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043 · DOI
  2. Amel-Zadeh, 2018, Why and how investors use ESG information: evidence from a global survey, Financial Analysts Journal, 74, 87, 10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. 2009. Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Biddle, 2009, How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48, 112, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Blacconiere, 1994, Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18, 357, 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90026-4 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bode, 2015, Corporate social initiatives and employee retention, Organization Science, 26, 1702, 10.1287/orsc.2015.1006 · DOI
  7. Burbano, V.C. 2019. Getting Gig Workers to Do More by Doing Good: Field Experimental Evidence. Organization & Environment. Early online version: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1086026619846455 · DOI
  8. Freiberg, D., Grewal, J. and Serafeim, G. 2020. Science-Based Carbon Emissions Targets. Working paper. · DOI
  9. Castelo Branco, 2006, Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives, Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111, 10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z · DOI
  10. Chen, 2018, The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65, 169, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cheng, 2013, Does investment efficiency improve after the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting?, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 1, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.03.001 · DOI
  12. Christensen, H., Hail, L. and Leuz, C. 2019. Adoption of CSR and Sustainability Reporting Standards: Economic Analysis and Review. European Corporate Governance Institute - Finance Working Paper No. 623/2019. · DOI
  13. Cho, 2015, Segment disclosure transparency and internal capital market efficiency: evidence from SFAS No. 131, Journal of Accounting Research, 53, 669, 10.1111/1475-679X.12089 · DOI
  14. Dahlmann, 2017, Managing Carbon Aspirations: The Influence of Climate Change Targets on Environmental Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 1, 10.1007/s10551-017-3731-z · DOI
  15. Daske, 2008, Mandatory IFRS Reporting around the World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences, Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 1085, 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00306.x · DOI
  16. Doshi, 2013, How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure, Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1209, 10.1002/smj.2055 · DOI
  17. Downar, B., Ernstberger, J., Reichelstein, S., Schwenen, S. and Zaklan, A. 2020. The impact of carbon disclosure mandates on emissions and financial operating performance. Working paper. · DOI
  18. Durand, 2019, Do investors actually value sustainability indices? Replication, development, and new evidence on CSR visibility, Strategic Management Journal, 40, 1471, 10.1002/smj.3035 · DOI
  19. Dyreng, 2016, Public pressure and corporate tax behavior, Journal of Accounting Research, 54, 182, 10.1111/1475-679X.12101 · DOI
  20. Eccles, 2011, Market interest in nonfinancial information, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23, 113, 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2011.00357.x · DOI
  21. Flammer, 2018, Competing for government procurement contracts: The role of corporate social responsibility, Strategic Management Journal, 39, 1299, 10.1002/smj.2767 · DOI
  22. Flammer, 2017, Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: evidence from a quasi-experiment, Strategic Management Journal, 38, 163, 10.1002/smj.2492 · DOI
  23. Graafland, 2004, Benchmarking of Corporate Social Responsibility: Methodological Problems and Robustness, Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 137, 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039404.67854.e1 · DOI
  24. Graham, 2011, Real effects of accounting rules: evidence from multinational firms’ investment location and profit repatriation decisions, Journal of Accounting Research, 49, 137, 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00395.x · DOI
  25. Granja, 2018, Disclosure regulation in commercial banking: lessons from the National Banking Era, Journal of Accounting Research, 56, 173, 10.1111/1475-679X.12193 · DOI
  26. Grewal, 2019, Market Reaction to Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure, Management Science, 65, 2947, 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3099 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Griffin, 2017, The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emission disclosures, Contemporary Accounting Research, 34, 1265, 10.1111/1911-3846.12298 · DOI
  28. Iacus, S.M., King, G. & Porro, G. 2011. Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Society for Political Methodology. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Ioannou, 2015, The effect of target difficulty on target completion: The case of reducing carbon emissions, The Accounting Review, 91, 1467, 10.2308/accr-51307 · DOI
  30. Jouvenot, V. and Krueger, P. 2020. Reduction in corporate greenhouse gas emissions under prescriptive disclosure requirements. Working paper. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kotsantonis, 2019, Four things no one will tell you about ESG data, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31, 50, 10.1111/jacf.12346 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lins, 2017, Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis, Journal of Finance, 1785, 10.1111/jofi.12505 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Maxwell, 2000, Self-regulation and social welfare: the political economy of corporate environmentalism, Journal of Law & Economics, 43, 583, 10.1086/467466 · DOI
  34. Nitoiu, 2013, From Voluntary to Mandatory: The evolution of GHG reporting, Sustainalytics Reporter, 16
  35. Rauter, 2020, The effect of mandatory extraction payment disclosures on corporate payment and investment policies abroad, Journal of Accounting Research, 58, 1075, 10.1111/1475-679X.12332 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Roberts, 2002, Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077, 10.1002/smj.274 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Rosenbaum, 1985, Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score, The American Statistician, 39, 33, 10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383 · DOI
  38. Rupp, 2013, Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: the moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity, Personnel Psychology, 66, 895, 10.1111/peps.12030 · DOI
  39. Shen, 2017, These 100 companies are responsible for most of the world’s carbon emissions, Fortune
  40. Shroff, 2017, Corporate investment and changes in GAAP, Review of Accounting Studies, 22, 1, 10.1007/s11142-016-9375-x · DOI
  41. Simnett, 2009, Developing an international assurance standard on greenhouse gas statements, Accounting Horizons, 23, 347, 10.2308/acch.2009.23.4.347 · DOI
  42. Taebi, 2017, On effectiveness and legitimacy of ‘shaming’ as a strategy for combatting climate change, Science and Engineering Ethics, 23, 1289, 10.1007/s11948-017-9909-z · DOI
  43. Taylor, 2019, Revealed: the 20 firms behind a third of all carbon emissions, The Guardian
  44. Tingley, D. and Tomz, M. 2020. The effects of naming and shaming on public support for compliance with international agreements: An experimental analysis of the Paris Agreement. Workingpaper. · DOI
  45. Tomar, S. 2019. CSR Disclosure and Benchmarking-Learning: Emissions Responses to Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Disclosure. Workingpaper. · DOI
  46. Zellner, 1962, An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, 348, 10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grewal, J.
Corresponding author
Grewal, Jody
ORCID
Grewal, Jody
Venue
Journal of Accounting and Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Pages
101390
ISSN
0165-4101 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101390
OpenAlex
W3130176491
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
Type
retraction
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Update notices
retraction (2021-02-18)
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Accounting and Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Financial Reporting and XBRL
Keywords
disclosure regulation, voluntary disclosure, real effects, financial reporting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review