Cited by 333Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationAsthma and respiratory diseasesSinusitis and nasal conditions

Epidemiology of seasonal and perennial rhinitis: clinical presentation and medical history.

Open access
Sibbald, B, Rink, E·1991·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the epidemiology of rhinitis, particularly the perennial and non-allergic forms. The aim of this study was to compare the symptoms, atopic state, and medical history of individuals with seasonal and perennial rhinitis. DESIGN: Of 7702 adults aged 16-65 years registered with a London general practice, 2969 (30%) were screened by postal questionnaire. Samples of 113 subjects without rhinitis, 51 with seasonal symptoms alone, 128 with perennial symptoms and seasonal exacerbations were then interviewed. Atopic and non-atopic subjects were distinguished by skinprick testing with five common allergens. RESULTS: The estimated minimum prevalence of rhinitis was 24%: 3% had seasonal symptoms only, of whom 78% were atopic; 13% had perennial symptoms only, of whom 50% were atopic; and 8% had perennial symptoms with seasonal exacerbations, of whom 68% were atopic. Seasonal rhinitis was characterised by sneezing, itching, and a high prevalence of diurnal variation in symptoms. The most common provoking factors were dust, pollens, and infections. By comparison, perennial rhinitis was characterised by a higher prevalence of nasal blockage and catarrh, and a lower prevalence of diurnal variation and provocation by pollen. There were no significant differences among the groups in the sociodemographic characteristics examined. Subjects with seasonal rhinitis were more likely to be atopic and to have eczema and a family history of hayfever than those without rhinitis. Those with perennial rhinitis were more likely to have past or current eczema or migraine, be wheezy or labelled asthmatic, or have a family history of nose trouble other than hayfever. Subjects with both seasonal and perennial symptoms presented an intermediate clinical picture. CONCLUSIONS: Seasonal and perennial rhinitis differ in their atopic state, clinical presentation, and medical history. The extent to which these differences are genetically or environmentally determined requires further investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thx.46.12.895

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most inhaled allergens are associated with nasal and bronchial symptoms, but epidemiologic studies show differences, such as in pollen allergy.

    “Most inhaled allergens are associated with nasal1787 and bronchial symptoms, but in epidemiologic studies, differences have been observed (eg, in pollen allergy).”

    From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [1787]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) reports that pollen sensitivity was less common in perennial than seasonal rhinitis, and Medical History (table 4; page not supplied) reports differences in wheeze and asthma between rhinitis groups. These findings support the claim that epidemiologic differences occur, including for pollen. The paper does not establish the broader assertion that most inhaled allergens are associated with both nasal and bronchial symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Mygind N. Nasal allergy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979:219-21, 224-25.
  2. Pepys J. Skin testing. Br J Hosp Med 1975;14:412-7.
  3. CofEman D, Chalmers CP. Incidence of hayfever in a North London practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 1974;24:171-80.
  4. Fleming DM, Crombie DL. Prevalence of asthma and hayfever in England and Wales. BMJ 1987;294:279-83.
  5. Weeke ER. Epidemiology of hayfever and perennial allergic rhinitis. Monogr Allergy 1987;21:1-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sibbald, B., & Rink, E.
Affiliations
St George's Hospital (GB)
ORCID
Rink, E
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1991-12-01
Volume
46
Issue
12
Pages
895-901
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129692365
Cited by
333
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Keywords
seasonal rhinitis, perennial rhinitis, non-allergic rhinitis, atopy, prevalence, clinical features, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, dust allergy, medical history, wheezing, migraine
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Allergens, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immediate, London, Middle Aged, Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial, Skin Tests, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review