The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ImmunoCAP assays: Pros and cons in allergology
Abstract
Allergen-specific IgE measurements and the clinical history are the cornerstones of allergy diagnosis. During the past decades, both characterization and standardization of allergen extracts and assay technology have improved. Here we discuss the uses, advantages, misinterpretations, and limitations of ImmunoCAP IgE assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific/Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden) in the field of allergology. They can be performed as singleplex (ImmunoCAP) and, for the last decade, as multiplex (Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip [ISAC]). The major benefit of ImmunoCAP is the obtained quantified allergen-specific IgE antibody level and the lack of interference from allergen-specific IgG antibodies. However, ImmunoCAP allergen extracts are limited to the composition of the extract. The introduction of allergen molecules has had a major effect on analytic specificity and allergy diagnosis. They are used in both singleplex ImmunoCAP and multiplex ImmunoCAP ISAC assays. The major advantage of ISAC is the comprehensive IgE pattern obtained with a minute amount of serum. The shortcomings are its semiquantitative measurements, lower linear range, and cost per assay. With respect to assay performance, ImmunoCAP allergen extracts are good screening tools, but allergen molecules dissect the IgE response on a molecular level and put allergy research on the map of precision medicine.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ImmunoCAP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) is a singleplex diagnostic assay that tests for specific IgE to a single allergen or allergenic component per test [199].”
From Pollen–Food Allergy Syndrome: Allergens, Clinical Insights, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [199]
Citations
Cites
Westman, M., Lupinek, C., Bousquet, J., Andersson, N., Pahr, S., Baar, A., Bergström, A., Holmström, M., Stjärne, P., Lødrup Carlsen, K. C., et al. (2015) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.10.042 · Cited by 141
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Wide, 1967, Diagnosis of allergy by an in-vitro test for allergen antibodies, Lancet, 2, 1105, 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90615-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Valenta, 1991, Recombinant allergens for immunoblot diagnosis of tree-pollen allergy, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 88, 889, 10.1016/0091-6749(91)90245-J · DOI
- Hiller, 2002, Microarrayed allergen molecules: diagnostic gatekeepers for allergy treatment, FASEB J, 16, 414, 10.1096/fj.01-0711fje · DOI
- Klimek, 2015, Diagnostic test allergens used for in vivo diagnosis of allergic diseases are at risk: a European Perspective, Allergy, 70, 1329, 10.1111/all.12676 · DOI
- Wollmann, 2015, Natural clinical tolerance to peanut in African patients is caused by poor allergenic activity of peanut IgE, Allergy, 70, 638, 10.1111/all.12592 · DOI
- Asarnoj, 2017, Prediction of peanut allergy in adolescence by early childhood storage protein-specific IgE signatures: the BAMSE population-based birth cohort, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.973 · DOI
- Stringari, 2014, The effect of component-resolved diagnosis on specific immunotherapy prescription in children with hay fever, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 134, 75, 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.042 · DOI
- Matricardi, 2016, EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide, Pediatr Allergy Immunol, 27, 1, 10.1111/pai.12563 · DOI · Paper page
- van Hage, 2017, Performance evaluation of ImmunoCAP(R) ISAC 112: a multi-site study, Clin Chem Lab Med, 55, 571, 10.1515/cclm-2016-0586 · DOI
- Lupinek, 2014, Advances in allergen-microarray technology for diagnosis and monitoring of allergy: the MeDALL allergen-chip, Methods, 66, 106, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.10.008 · DOI
- Asarnoj, 2016, Sensitization to cat and dog allergen molecules in childhood and prediction of symptoms of cat and dog allergy in adolescence: a BAMSE/MeDALL study, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 137, 813, 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.09.052 · DOI · Paper page
- Wollmann, 2015, Reduction in allergen-specific IgE binding as measured by microarray: a possible surrogate marker for effects of specific immunotherapy, J Allergy Clin Immunol, 136, 806, 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.02.034 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Hage, M., Käck, U., Asarnoj, A., & Konradsen, J. R. (2023) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2023.03.003 · Cited by 40
Riabova, K., Karsonova, A. V., van Hage, M., Käck, U., Konradsen, J. R., Grönlund, H., Fomina, D., Beltyukov, E., Glazkova, P. A., Semenov, D. Y., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23136984 · Cited by 21
Self-citationPollen–Food Allergy Syndrome: Allergens, Clinical Insights, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges
Haidar, L., Bănărescu, C. F., Uța, C., Moldovan, S. I., Zimbru, E.-L., Zimbru, R.-I., Ciurariu, E., Georgescu, M., & Panaitescu, C. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15010066 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- van Hage, M., Hamsten, C., & Valenta, R.
- ORCID
- Hamsten, Carl
- Venue
- Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 974-977
- ISSN
- 0091-6749
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ImmunoCAP assays: Pros and cons in allergology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.05.008
- The paper
- van Hage, M., Hamsten, C., & Valenta, R. (2017). ImmunoCAP assays: Pros and cons in allergology. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.05.008