Cited by 67Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGun Ownership and Violence Research

Universal Pediatric Suicide Risk Screening in a Health Care System: 90,000 Patient Encounters

Roaten, Kimberly, Horowitz, Lisa M., Bridge, Jeffrey A., Goans, Christian R.R., McKintosh, Chris, Genzel, Russell, Johnson, Celeste, North, Carol S.·2021·Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Suicidal behavior is increasing among US youths. Contact with the health care system is common in the months before suicide. Objective To assess the characteristics of suicide risk among youths presenting for health care, universal screening results from a large hospital system were analyzed. Methods A retrospective analysis of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions tool administered to patients aged 10-17 years in a hospital system including an emergency department, inpatient medical units, and primary care clinics was conducted. Demographic and clinical data from 3 years of encounters were analyzed. Results The sample consisted of 91,580 pediatric encounters, predominantly white Hispanic and women, with one third speaking Spanish. Across health care settings, 2.9% of encounters produced positive suicide risk screens, with the highest rate in the emergency department (8.5%). Acute positive screens, indicating imminent risk for suicidal behavior, accounted for 0.3% of all encounters. Approximately one-fourth (27.6%) of encounters for psychiatric presenting problems screened positive compared with 2.3% for nonpsychiatric encounters. Higher rates of positive screens were present among encounters for psychiatric presenting problems across all settings. Positive screens were less common among preteen (1.8%) than adolescent (3.1%) encounters (χ 2 = 65.50, P Conclusions Universal screening detected suicide risk in approximately 3% of pediatric health care encounters. Screen…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaclp.2020.12.002

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roaten, K., Horowitz, L. M., Bridge, J. A., Goans, C. R. R., McKintosh, C., Genzel, R., Johnson, C., & North, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Parkland Health & Hospital System (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Roaten, Kimberly
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
421-429
ISSN
2667-2960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134882758
Cited by
67
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002922)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Keywords
suicide risk screening, universal screening, Ask Suicide-Screening Questions, adolescents, preadolescents, emergency department visits, hospital visits, Hispanic patients
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Child, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Retrospective Studies, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review