Cited by 35Medication Adherence and ComplianceTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and Access

An assessment of patient preference and adherence to treatment with Wellbutrin SR: A web-based survey

Granger, Arthur L., Fehnel, Sheri E., Hogue, Susan L., Bennett, Lee, Edin, Heather M.·2006·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Research has shown that lack of treatment adherence is a serious problem, especially among patients with psychiatric disorders. The current study was conducted to assess adherence and patient preference among individuals taking Wellbutrin SR (bupropion) for depression, as well as their interest in a once-daily formulation of bupropion.Methods A 20-item web-based survey was administered to 527 individuals (276 men and 251 women) recruited through an online panel. All participants were at least 18 years of age, diagnosed with major depressive disorder, and had been taking Wellbutrin SR for at least 6 weeks. Survey items addressed treatment regimen, adherence, satisfaction with Wellbutrin SR, and interest in a once-daily formulation of bupropion.Results The majority of respondents reported taking Wellbutrin SR twice a day (67%). Only 15% of once-daily users were nonadherent compared to 37% of twice-daily users and 65% of thrice-daily users. The most common reason reported for missing a dose of Wellbutrin SR was simply forgetting to take it (49% of twice-daily users and 65% of thrice-daily users). Results indicated that 77% of twice-daily users and 94% of thrice-daily users were interested in a once-daily formula.Conclusions A reduction in dosing frequency is favored by Wellbutrin SR users and likely to improve their adherence to treatment. Because greater adherence has been shown to facilitate symptom relief, improvements in quality of life, and reductions in healthcare expenses, the results of this study support the value of the recently released once-daily formulation, Wellbutrin XL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2005.08.018

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medical studies have shown that adherence is associated with better outcomes, regardless of whether patients received placebo or active interventions.

    “Medical studies have shown that adherence is associated with better outcomes, regardless of whether patients received placebo or active interventions [78,79].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Granger, A. L., Fehnel, S. E., Hogue, S. L., Bennett, L., & Edin, H. M.
Affiliations
  • RTI Health Solutions (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Granger, Arthur L.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
90
Issue
2-3
Pages
217-221
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127077956
Cited by
35
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
bupropion, medication adherence, patient preferences, major depressive disorder, dosing frequency, once-daily formulation, medication satisfaction, dose skipping
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Delayed-Action Preparations, Depressive Disorder, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Bupropion, Patient Satisfaction, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review