Cited by 56Treatment of Major DepressionPsychological Treatments and DisordersBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Pharmacotherapy to sustain the fully remitted state

Open access
Kennedy, Sidney, McIntyre, Roger, Fallu, Angelo, Lam, Raymond·2002·Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience

Abstract

Full remission should be the goal of antidepressant therapy; anything less leaves the patient with residual symptoms and an increased risk of relapse and recurrence. Most antidepressant agents offer similar rates of response, but there are some differences in the ability of different agents to promote a full remission. The greatest chance of achieving full remission occurs early in the course of treatment; thus, initial antidepressant strategies should be those that have the greatest therapeutic potential. Other strategies that may help improve the chances of achieving full remission include optimizing drug dosages and using combination and augmentation strategies. Failure to achieve full remission and early discontinuation of antidepressant therapy have been associated with a greater incidence of relapse and recurrence. Continued antidepressant therapy has clearly been shown to effectively reduce the probability of relapse and recurrence by about half compared with placebo. Therefore, once a patient achieves remission, it is important to continue the same antidepressant therapy for at least 6–12 months and, for many patients, considerably longer. Medication should continue at the dose that was initially effective because using low-dose maintenance therapy appears to decrease the protective benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/jpn.0245

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, S., McIntyre, R., Fallu, A., & Lam, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Woodward Clinic, Sherbrooke, Que
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Published
2002-07
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
269-280
ISSN
  • 1180-4882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1488-2434
OpenAlex
W154379355
Cited by
56
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
relapse prevention, depression recurrence, antidepressant augmentation, combination therapy, antidepressant discontinuation, residual depressive symptoms, drug dosing optimization
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review