Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Onset of remission and relapse in depression: Testing operational criteria through course description in a second Dublin cohort of first-admission participants

O'Leary, Denis, Hickey, Tara, Lagendijk, Malie, Webb, Marcus·2010·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background This paper extends previous work describing course in depression using a recommended operational model that defines remission onset and relapse. We test whether a similar course pattern would emerge using this model in a new cohort of depressed participants. Methods We recruited a cohort of 86 participants, first-time inpatients, with DSM-IV major depression. Outcome was assessed prospectively over a 13-month minimum follow-up period. Remission onset was defined as a Ham-D score 16 for two consecutive weeks and meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. Results The cumulative probability of remission onset was 0.62 (SE=0.05) and 0.80 (SE=0.05) at 3 and 6 months following study entry. The relapse risk was 0.28 (SE=0.05) at 6 months post remission onset; 53% of those relapsing did so in the first 2 months post remission onset. Predictors of longer times to remission onset included: longer illness length, higher anxiety scores and unemployment; higher anxiety scores predicted relapse. The course pattern is similar to that reported previously. Limitations These findings apply to inpatients only. Course was not rated blind to all of the participants' baseline data. Conclusions Defining remission onset and relapse using this model is associated with a replicable course pattern. A singular clinical advantage of the model is the identification of those participants at highest risk of relapse 2 months post remission onset.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.107

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Alexopoulos, 1996, Recovery in geriatric depression, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 53, 305, 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830040039008 · DOI
  2. 2000, Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (revision), Am. J. Psychiatry, 157, 1
  3. Anderson, 2000, Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants; a review of the 1993 British Association of Psychopharmacology Guidelines, J. Psychopharm., 14, 3, 10.1177/026988110001400101 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Beck, 1988, An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety, Psychometric properties. J. Consult. & Clin. Psychol., 56, 893, 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Coryell, 1992, Anxiety syndromes as epiphenomena of primary major depression: outcome and familial psychopathology, Am. J. Psychiatry, 149, 100, 10.1176/ajp.149.1.100 · DOI
  6. Hamilton, 1960, A rating scale for depression, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. & Psychiatry., 23, 56, 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kaplan, 1958, Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations, J. American. Statist. Assoc., 53, 457, 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Keitner, 1991, 12months outcome of patients with major depression and co-morbid psychiatric or medical illness (compound depression), Am. J. Psychiatry, 148, 345, 10.1176/ajp.148.3.345 · DOI
  9. Keitner, 1992, Recovery and major depression: factors associated with twelve month outcome, Am. J. Psychiatry, 149, 93, 10.1176/ajp.149.1.93 · DOI
  10. Keller, M.B., Shapiro, R.W., 1984. Double Depression: a superimposition of acute depressive episodes on chronic depressive disorders. Am. J. Psych. 139, 438–442. · DOI
  11. Lagendijk, M-C 2003. Remission onset and relapse in depression: Personality, life events and anxiety as independent variables — a 12month prospective follow-up study. University of Dublin, Trinity College, M.Sc. Dissertation. Location: Santry TX 1-642.
  12. O'Leary, 2000, Remission onset and relapse in depression, J. Affect. Disord., 57, 159, 10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00086-5 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Paykel, 1997, The interview for recent life events, Psychol. Med., 27, 301, 10.1017/S0033291796004424 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Prien, 1986, Continuation drug therapy for major depressive episodes: how long should it be maintained?, Am. J. Psychiatry, 143, 18, 10.1176/ajp.143.1.18 · DOI
  15. Prien, 1991, The definition and operational criteria for treatment outcome of major depressive disorder: a review of the current literature, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 48, 796, 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810330020003 · DOI
  16. Shea, 1992, Course of depressive symptoms over follow-up. Findings from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 49, 782, 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100026006 · DOI
  17. Uehara, 1996, Expressed emotion and short-term treatment outcome of outpatients with major depression, Comp. Psychiatr, 299, 10.1016/S0010-440X(96)90009-7 · DOI
  18. Van Londen, 1998, Three to five year prospective follow up of outcome in major depression, Psychol. Med., 28, 731, 10.1017/S0033291797006466 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O'Leary, D., Hickey, T., Lagendijk, M., & Webb, M.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
125
Issue
1-3
Pages
221-226
ISSN
0165-0327
Cited by
4
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review