The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Onset of remission and relapse in depression: Testing operational criteria through course description in a second Dublin cohort of first-admission participants
Abstract
Background This paper extends previous work describing course in depression using a recommended operational model that defines remission onset and relapse. We test whether a similar course pattern would emerge using this model in a new cohort of depressed participants. Methods We recruited a cohort of 86 participants, first-time inpatients, with DSM-IV major depression. Outcome was assessed prospectively over a 13-month minimum follow-up period. Remission onset was defined as a Ham-D score 16 for two consecutive weeks and meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. Results The cumulative probability of remission onset was 0.62 (SE=0.05) and 0.80 (SE=0.05) at 3 and 6 months following study entry. The relapse risk was 0.28 (SE=0.05) at 6 months post remission onset; 53% of those relapsing did so in the first 2 months post remission onset. Predictors of longer times to remission onset included: longer illness length, higher anxiety scores and unemployment; higher anxiety scores predicted relapse. The course pattern is similar to that reported previously. Limitations These findings apply to inpatients only. Course was not rated blind to all of the participants' baseline data. Conclusions Defining remission onset and relapse using this model is associated with a replicable course pattern. A singular clinical advantage of the model is the identification of those participants at highest risk of relapse 2 months post remission onset.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the exact amount of time necessary to achieve this drop (as counted from the start of the asymptomatic period) differs per study, ranging from about 2 months (O'Leary et al. 2010) to about 3 years (Judd et al. 1998).”
From Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as O'Leary et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“Several studies show some indication of a sudden drop in relapse/recurrence rate a certain time after remission/recovery was obtained”
From Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as O'Leary et al. 2010
Citations
Cites
Frank, E. (1991) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810330075011 · Cited by 1,959 · cited 4×
“The definitions of remission onset and relapse using the Ham-D were the same as in our previous paper and based on recommended operational criteria (Frank et al., 1991; O'Leary et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMethodological aspects of life events research
Paykel, E. S. (1983) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(83)90065-x · Cited by 412
Keller, M. B. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3152 · Cited by 388
Long-term Outcome of Episodes of Major Depression: Clinical and Public Health Significance
Keller, M. B. (1984) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.252.6.788 · Cited by 295
Remission and relapse in major depression: a two-year prospective follow-up study
Ramana, R., Paykel, E. S., Cooper, Z., Hayhurst, H., Saxty, M., & Surtees, P. G. (1995) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700033134 · Cited by 236 · cited 2×
“Relative to course description as defined using different models or criteria (Keller et al., 1984; Keller and Shapiro, 1984; Keitner et al., 1991; Shea et al., 1992; Ramana et al., 1995; Alexopoulos et al., 1996), we found two key differences using this model (O'Leary et al.”
BackgroundMethodGender, Social support and recovery from depressive disorders: a prospective clinical study
Brugha, T. S., Bebbington, P. E., MacCarthy, B., Sturt, E., Wykes, T., & Potter, J. (1990) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700013325 · Cited by 135
Pilgrim, J. A., Mellers, J. D., Boothby, H. A., & Mann, A. H. (1993) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700025551 · Cited by 50
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Alexopoulos, 1996, Recovery in geriatric depression, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 53, 305, 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830040039008 · DOI
- 2000, Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (revision), Am. J. Psychiatry, 157, 1
- Anderson, 2000, Evidence-based guidelines for treating depressive disorders with antidepressants; a review of the 1993 British Association of Psychopharmacology Guidelines, J. Psychopharm., 14, 3, 10.1177/026988110001400101 · DOI · Paper page
- Beck, 1988, An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety, Psychometric properties. J. Consult. & Clin. Psychol., 56, 893, 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893 · DOI · Paper page
- Coryell, 1992, Anxiety syndromes as epiphenomena of primary major depression: outcome and familial psychopathology, Am. J. Psychiatry, 149, 100, 10.1176/ajp.149.1.100 · DOI
- Hamilton, 1960, A rating scale for depression, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. & Psychiatry., 23, 56, 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaplan, 1958, Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations, J. American. Statist. Assoc., 53, 457, 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · DOI · Paper page
- Keitner, 1991, 12months outcome of patients with major depression and co-morbid psychiatric or medical illness (compound depression), Am. J. Psychiatry, 148, 345, 10.1176/ajp.148.3.345 · DOI
- Keitner, 1992, Recovery and major depression: factors associated with twelve month outcome, Am. J. Psychiatry, 149, 93, 10.1176/ajp.149.1.93 · DOI
- Keller, M.B., Shapiro, R.W., 1984. Double Depression: a superimposition of acute depressive episodes on chronic depressive disorders. Am. J. Psych. 139, 438–442. · DOI
- Lagendijk, M-C 2003. Remission onset and relapse in depression: Personality, life events and anxiety as independent variables — a 12month prospective follow-up study. University of Dublin, Trinity College, M.Sc. Dissertation. Location: Santry TX 1-642.
- O'Leary, 2000, Remission onset and relapse in depression, J. Affect. Disord., 57, 159, 10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00086-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Paykel, 1997, The interview for recent life events, Psychol. Med., 27, 301, 10.1017/S0033291796004424 · DOI · Paper page
- Prien, 1986, Continuation drug therapy for major depressive episodes: how long should it be maintained?, Am. J. Psychiatry, 143, 18, 10.1176/ajp.143.1.18 · DOI
- Prien, 1991, The definition and operational criteria for treatment outcome of major depressive disorder: a review of the current literature, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 48, 796, 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810330020003 · DOI
- Shea, 1992, Course of depressive symptoms over follow-up. Findings from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 49, 782, 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100026006 · DOI
- Uehara, 1996, Expressed emotion and short-term treatment outcome of outpatients with major depression, Comp. Psychiatr, 299, 10.1016/S0010-440X(96)90009-7 · DOI
- Van Londen, 1998, Three to five year prospective follow up of outcome in major depression, Psychol. Med., 28, 731, 10.1017/S0033291797006466 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recurrence in major depression: A conceptual analysis
Monroe, S. M., & Harkness, K. L. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0025190 · Cited by 225
de Zwart, P. L., Jeronimus, B. F., & de Jonge, P. (2019) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796018000227 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Leary, D., Hickey, T., Lagendijk, M., & Webb, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 221-226
- ISSN
- 0165-0327
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review