Cited by 90Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Behavioural activation for depression: Efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination

Soucy Chartier, Isabelle, Provencher, Martin D.·2013·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Depression being a prevalent psychobiological disorder across the world, there is a need to identify effective, evidence-based treatments that are time and cost-effective in an effort to increase the population's accessibility to treatments. Low-intensity interventions, such as guided self-help treatments, hold promise for the dissemination of evidence-based treatments. Behavioural activation, a component of cognitive-behavioural therapy, is receiving increasing attention and empirical support as a stand-alone psychological treatment for depression. This article reviews behavioural activation's theoretical foundations and efficacy in light of determining its potential as a low-intensity intervention.Method A systematic review of articles on low-intensity behavioural activation interventions for depression was conducted using the PsychInfo, Medline and Embase databases. Behavioural activation's potential for dissemination as a guided self-help treatment is discussed and future avenues of research are stressed.Limitations Studies on the efficacy of behavioural activation as a guided self-help treatment are very limited to date and there are significant variations among existing studies.Conclusions Based on the research literature, it can be concluded that behavioural activation could be a viable option as a low-intensity guided self-help psychological treatment for mild to moderate depression. Further research is required to better understand the optimal parameters and client-therapist characteristics of this form of low-intensity intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2012.07.023

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soucy Chartier, I., & Provencher, M. D.
Affiliations
Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec (CA)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
145
Issue
3
Pages
292-299
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080439366
Cited by
90
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
behavioral activation, depression, guided self-help, low-intensity intervention, dissemination of evidence-based treatment, treatment efficacy, mild to moderate depression, cognitive behavioral therapy
MeSH terms
Depression, Humans, Self Care, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review