Cited by 324Physical Activity and HealthMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physical activity and anxiety: A perspective from the World Health Survey

Open access

Abstract

Background Despite the known benefits of physical activity (PA) among people with anxiety, little is known about PA levels in people with anxiety at the population level. This study explored the global prevalence of anxiety and its association with PA.Methods Cross-sectional, community-based data from the World Health Survey was analyzed. Prevalence of anxiety was estimated for 237,964 individuals (47 countries). PA was categorized as low, moderate, and high based on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (short form). The association between PA and anxiety was assessed by multivariable logistic regression.Results The overall global prevalence of anxiety was 11.4% (47 countries). Across 38 countries with available data on PA, 62.5%, 20.2%, and 17.3% of the sample engaged in high, moderate, and low levels of PA respectively. The prevalence of low physical activity in those with and without anxiety was 22.9% vs. 16.6% (p<0.001) (38 countries, n=184,920). In the pooled model adjusted for socio-demographics, depression, and country, individuals engaging in low PA (vs. high PA) had 1.32 (95% CI=1.17-1.47) times higher odds for anxiety than those with high PA. Female sex, older age, lower education and wealth, and depression were also associated with low PA. At the individual country level, there was a significant positive association between low PA and anxiety in 17 of the 38 countries.Conclusion Low PA levels are associated with increased prevalence of anxiety. There is a need for longitudinal research to establish the directionality of the relationships observed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.028

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Craig, 2003, International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity including commentary by Bassett DR Jr, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 35, 1381, 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stubbs, B., Koyanagi, A., Hallgren, M., Firth, J., Richards, J., Schuch, F., Rosenbaum, S., Mugisha, J., Veronese, N., Lahti, J., & Vancampfort, D.
Affiliations
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Butabika Hospital (UG)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Stubbs, Brendon
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
208
Pages
545-552
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2533733143
Cited by
324
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18
FWCI
16.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care Funding
  • Miguel Servet Contract (CP13/ 00,150, PI15/00862)
  • ISCIII - General Branch Evaluation and Promotion of Health Research
  • European Regional Development Fund (ERDF-FEDER)
  • Society for Mental Health Research Early Career Fellowship (Australia)
  • Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO – Vlaanderen)
  • NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (Australia)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
physical activity, anxiety, anxiety prevalence, physical inactivity, cross-national comparison, depression, socioeconomic factors, sex differences, age, wealth, mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Global Health, Exercise, Prevalence, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review