Cited by 115Impact of Light on Environment and HealthCircadian rhythm and melatoninSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Outdoor light at night and the prevalence of depressive symptoms and suicidal behaviors: a cross-sectional study in a nationally representative sample of Korean adults.

Min, Jin-young, Min, Kyoung-bok·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Outdoor light at night (LAN) is an increasingly prevalent type of environmental pollution. Studies have demonstrated that outdoor LAN can disrupt circadian rhythms, potentially contributing to insomnia, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and metabolic changes in humans. We investigated the association of outdoor LAN with depressive symptoms and suicidal behaviors in South Korean adults. Methods This study used data from the 2009 Korean Community Health Survey, a representative sample dataset. Study population consisted of 113,119 participants for the assessment of depressive symptoms and 152,159 participants for the assessment of suicidal behavior. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Korean version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (depressive symptoms, score of > 16). Suicidal behaviors were defined as the experience of suicidal ideation or attempt. Outdoor LAN was estimated by satellite data from the National Centers for Environmental Information. Results Participants with depressive symptoms or history of suicidal behaviors were more likely to have exposure to outdoor LAN than those without depressive symptoms or suicidal behaviors. Compared with adults living in areas exposed to the lowest outdoor LAN, those living in areas exposed to the highest levels had higher likelihood depressive symptoms (OR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.15-1.46) or suicidal behaviors (OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.16-1.39). Significant dose-response relationships were observed between outdoor LAN and the odds of depressive symptoms and suicidal behaviors. Conclusion Outdoor LAN was found to be significantly associated with depressive symptoms and suicidal behaviors, suggesting that it may be an environmental contributor to mental health problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.039

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Min, J.-Y., & Min, K.-B.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Min, Kyoung-bok
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
227
Pages
199-205
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765268057
Cited by
115
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2015R1A1A3A04000923, 2015R1D1A1A01059048)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Impact of Light on Environment and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
light pollution, depressive symptoms, suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, circadian rhythm disruption, mental health, dose-response relationship, Korean adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Lighting, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Republic of Korea, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review