Cited by 4Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumSexual function and dysfunction studies

Evaluating a midwife-led consultation for women after a traumatic birth experience: preliminary results

Open access
Avignon, Valérie, Annen, Valentine, Baud, David, Bourdin, Julie, Horsch, Antje·2025·Midwifery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 9 to 50 % of women report a traumatic birth experience and 12 % develop childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (CB-PTSS). A recent study using a postpartum midwifery-led counselling session showed promising results in reducing CB-PTSS, but more evidence is needed. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of a midwifery-led counselling session 6 weeks post-partum or later, on depression and CB-PTSS. STUDY DESIGN: The pre-post-intervention study, including 159 women, took place in a Swiss 18 university hospital. It was designed as a healthcare service quality project and therefore was therefore not registered a priori in a clinical trial registry. Ethical approval from the institutional board was obtained (n° 2020-06). A midwifery-led counselling session, six weeks or more after birth, allowed women to discuss their childbirth experience and to receive additional information about childbirth. Women completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) two weeks before and three months after the consultation. RESULTS: Results showed a significant decrease in depression and CB-PTSS, and in cases with probable childbirth-related posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis (CB-PTSD): 24.7 % (36/146) before counselling versus 6.3 % (5/80) three months after (p < 0.01). The session was rated as extremely/very satisfactory by 91 % of women and extremely/very useful by >87 % of women. No associations were found between depression and CB-PTSD scores and obstetrical or neonatal data. CONCLUSION: A midwifery-led single-session offered to women 6 weeks or more after birth seemed to be associated with a decrease of depression and CB-PTSS. However, the attrition rate (49 %) made definitive conclusions difficult. More research is needed with a larger sample, a randomized design, and a wait-list control group to consider the effect of time on depression or CB-PTSS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104358

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across mental health interventions, several RCTs and pre-post studies reported higher recovery at selected time points.

    “The included studies reported improvements in depressive symptom scores, clinical recovery at selected time points, anxiety, worry, and childbirth-related trauma symptoms (Avignon et al., 2025; Dennis et al., 2020; Husain et al., 2024; ¨ Ozhüner and ¨ Ozerdo ˘ gan, 2025; Van Lieshout et al., 2022; Xiao et al., 2025).”

    From Extending the continuum: Mapping post-6-week nurse/midwife-led interventions for postnatal women – A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as Avignon et al., 2025

    The Results (p. 1) report fewer cases of probable childbirth-related PTSD three months after counselling, alongside lower depression and trauma-symptom scores. This supports improvement at a selected time point, but the study is pre-post rather than an RCT and does not report a clinical recovery rate; its Conclusion (p. 1) also cautions that attrition limits definitive conclusions. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several non-randomized or pilot studies included in the review relied heavily on self-reported outcomes.

    “Several non-randomized or pilot studies had small sample sizes, lacked a concurrent comparison group, or relied heavily on self-reported outcomes (Aldridge et al., 2022; Avignon et al., 2025; Russell, 2025; Szajna et al., 2024).”
  • Across mental health interventions, several RCTs and pre-post studies reported reductions in anxiety, worry, or trauma symptoms.

    “The included studies reported improvements in depressive symptom scores, clinical recovery at selected time points, anxiety, worry, and childbirth-related trauma symptoms (Avignon et al., 2025; Dennis et al., 2020; Husain et al., 2024; ¨ Ozhüner and ¨ Ozerdo ˘ gan, 2025; Van Lieshout et al., 2022; Xiao et al., 2025).”
  • Across mental health interventions, several RCTs and pre-post studies reported lower depressive symptom scores.

    “The included studies reported improvements in depressive symptom scores, clinical recovery at selected time points, anxiety, worry, and childbirth-related trauma symptoms (Avignon et al., 2025; Dennis et al., 2020; Husain et al., 2024; ¨ Ozhüner and ¨ Ozerdo ˘ gan, 2025; Van Lieshout et al., 2022; Xiao et al., 2025).”
  • Several non-randomized or pilot studies included in the review had small sample sizes.

    “Several non-randomized or pilot studies had small sample sizes, lacked a concurrent comparison group, or relied heavily on self-reported outcomes (Aldridge et al., 2022; Avignon et al., 2025; Russell, 2025; Szajna et al., 2024).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bastos, M.H., Furuta, M., Small, R., McKenzie-McHarg, K., Bick, D., 2015b. Debriefing interventions for the prevention of psychological trauma in women following childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (4), CD007194 http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0266-6138(2500077-4/sbref0042)
  2. Gamble, J., Creedy, D., Moyle, W., Webster, J., McAllister, M., Dickson, P., 2005b. Effectiveness of a counseling intervention after a traumatic childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Birth 32 (1), 11 -19. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0266-6138(2500077-4/sbref0024)

Authors
Avignon, V., Annen, V., Baud, D., Bourdin, J., & Horsch, A.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Avignon, Valérie
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
144
Pages
104358
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408016671
Cited by
4
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (32003B_172982)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
birth trauma, postpartum depression, postpartum care, postpartum mental health, childbirth experience, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Counseling, Female, Humans, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Switzerland, Parturition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review